Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ctd;;3:17-cv-01374_de103> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ctd;;3:17-cv-01374_de103 RegisterActionDate "2021-07-20" @default.
- ctd;;3:17-cv-01374_de103 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER Mr. 6BFB65F 86 opposition to Defendants' motions for summary judgment ("Pl.'s Opp'n"), does not object to the dismissal of four Counts: Count 2, against all Defendants, Pl.'s Opp'n at 4;Count 12, against the City of Hartford, id. 16;Count 13, against Chief Rovella, id.;Count 15, against the City of Hartford, id. Accordingly, the Court dismisses as moot, Count 2 against all Defendants, Count 13 against Chief Rovella, and Counts 12 and 15 against the City of Hartford. See Martin-Trigona v. Shiff, 702 F.2d 380, 386 (2d Cir. 1983) ("The hallmark of a moot case or controversy is that the relief sought can no longer be given or is no longer needed"); see also Dietz v. Bouldin, 136 S. Ct. 1885, 1892 (2016) ("[D]istrict courts have the inherent authority to manage their dockets and courtrooms with a view toward the efficient and expedient resolution of cases."). The remaining Counts will be addressed at the upcoming motion hearing. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 7/20/2021. (Tisdale, I.) (Entered: 07/20/2021)" @default.
- ctd;;3:17-cv-01374_de103 AdministrativeID "98" @default.
- ctd;;3:17-cv-01374_de103 hasJudgeReference SJ002531 @default.
- ctd;;3:17-cv-01374_de103 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ctd;;3:17-cv-01374_de91 @default.