FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1776389368> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1776389368 abstract "This article makes a comparative analysis of the caselaw between the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights to verify how questions of political representation are dealt with in multicultural contexts. For this purpose, I discuss the theoretical debate on political representation in multicultural societies, followed by analysis of the caselaw from the two Courts regarding the theme, focusing on cases involving political parties. Then I answer the following questions: Is the caselaw from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights permeated by a multicultural vision of the law? Are there differences between the ways the two Courts deal with political representation in multicultural societies? Is it possible to classify the relevant judgments of the Courts according to some contemporary political philosophy? After responding to these questions, I present a comparative theoretical and jurisprudential discussion. ---------------- Este artigo fará uma análise comparativa entre a jurisprudência da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos e a Corte Europeia de Direitos Humanos com o fim de verificar como questões de representação política são tratadas em contextos multiculturais. Para tanto, discutirei acerca do debate teórico sobre representação política em sociedades multiculturais e, em seguida, analisarei a jurisprudência das duas cortes sobre o tema, com o foco em casos que envolvam partidos políticos. Depois, responderei às seguintes perguntas: As jurisprudências da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos e da Corte Europeia de Direitos Humanos são permeadas por uma visão multicultural do Direito? Há diferença entre a forma como as duas cortes lidam com a representação política em sociedades multiculturais? É possível classificar os julgamentos relevantes dessas duas cortes de acordo com alguma vertente da filosofia política contemporânea? Após responder a essas perguntas, discutirei comparativamente questões teóricas e jurisprudenciais." @default.
• W1776389368 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1776389368 creator A5070551268 @default.
• W1776389368 date "2015-07-31" @default.
• W1776389368 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1776389368 title "A comparative study of jurisprudence, between the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and European Court of Human Rights, regarding political representation in multicultural contexts" @default.
• W1776389368 cites W1506324957 @default.
• W1776389368 cites W1519075194 @default.
• W1776389368 cites W153290279 @default.
• W1776389368 cites W1541377132 @default.
• W1776389368 cites W1603082488 @default.
• W1776389368 cites W2071035832 @default.
• W1776389368 cites W2094722142 @default.
• W1776389368 cites W24300764 @default.
• W1776389368 cites W2805478194 @default.
• W1776389368 cites W3089821604 @default.
• W1776389368 cites W3134620039 @default.
• W1776389368 cites W3164113157 @default.
• W1776389368 cites W78433998 @default.
• W1776389368 doi "https://doi.org/10.12957/ballot.2015.17897" @default.
• W1776389368 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1776389368 type Work @default.
• W1776389368 sameAs 1776389368 @default.
• W1776389368 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1776389368 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1776389368 hasAuthorship W1776389368A5070551268 @default.
• W1776389368 hasBestOaLocation W17763893681 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConcept C2776359362 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConcept C542530943 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConceptScore W1776389368C144024400 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConceptScore W1776389368C169437150 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConceptScore W1776389368C17744445 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConceptScore W1776389368C199539241 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConceptScore W1776389368C2776359362 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConceptScore W1776389368C542530943 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConceptScore W1776389368C71043370 @default.
• W1776389368 hasConceptScore W1776389368C94625758 @default.
• W1776389368 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1776389368 hasLocation W17763893681 @default.
• W1776389368 hasOpenAccess W1776389368 @default.
• W1776389368 hasPrimaryLocation W17763893681 @default.
• W1776389368 hasRelatedWork W1596626596 @default.
• W1776389368 hasRelatedWork W1994808193 @default.
• W1776389368 hasRelatedWork W2034134589 @default.
• W1776389368 hasRelatedWork W2325268710 @default.
• W1776389368 hasRelatedWork W2581779613 @default.
• W1776389368 hasRelatedWork W2736484656 @default.
• W1776389368 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1776389368 hasRelatedWork W2898153616 @default.
• W1776389368 hasRelatedWork W3149306597 @default.
• W1776389368 hasRelatedWork W4281654067 @default.
• W1776389368 hasVolume "1" @default.
• W1776389368 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1776389368 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1776389368 magId "1776389368" @default.
• W1776389368 workType "article" @default.