FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017606363> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2017606363 endingPage "97" @default.
• W2017606363 startingPage "75" @default.
• W2017606363 abstract "Ethical decision-making is theorised to consist of four stages: identification of an ethical dilemma, ethical judgement, ethical intentions and ethical actions. The moral intensity of the situation has been found to influence the ethical decision-making process. Using a survey consisting of four scenarios, this study examined the relationship between perceived moral intensity and the first three stages of the ethical decision-making process for undergraduate accounting and other business students. Findings showed that the nature of the ethical dilemma in the scenarios impacted on perceived moral intensity and the ethical decision-making process. Moral intensity was found to be multi-dimensional in the study and the social consensus component of moral intensity demonstrated the strongest relationship with the ethical decision-making process. Differences were found between accounting and non-accounting students, though gender was not found to be significant. Implications of the findings and areas for future research are discussed in the paper." @default.
• W2017606363 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2017606363 creator A5001631222 @default.
• W2017606363 creator A5009520384 @default.
• W2017606363 date "2009-02-01" @default.
• W2017606363 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2017606363 title "Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-making: An Empirical Examination of Undergraduate Accounting and Business Students" @default.
• W2017606363 cites W115302034 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W1486375896 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W1494369278 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W1494371514 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W1495624000 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W1500092744 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W1525453564 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W1535683092 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W1793883808 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W1964884664 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W1966133764 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W1970462317 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W1997459834 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2003460063 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2004028350 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2009098029 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2009330847 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2011894050 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2020550191 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2022127722 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2024794037 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2026288783 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2031712365 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2045150308 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2050237941 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2067967519 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2078381522 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2079064050 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2083647746 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2089006805 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2113446703 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2116714889 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2119148378 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2124077410 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2126166355 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2152388735 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2159306398 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W2530534919 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W4233370052 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W4238608599 @default.
• W2017606363 cites W620585403 @default.
• W2017606363 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280802009454" @default.
• W2017606363 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2017606363 type Work @default.
• W2017606363 sameAs 2017606363 @default.
• W2017606363 citedByCount "79" @default.
• W2017606363 countsByYear W20176063632012 @default.
• W2017606363 countsByYear W20176063632013 @default.
• W2017606363 countsByYear W20176063632014 @default.
• W2017606363 countsByYear W20176063632015 @default.
• W2017606363 countsByYear W20176063632016 @default.
• W2017606363 countsByYear W20176063632017 @default.
• W2017606363 countsByYear W20176063632018 @default.
• W2017606363 countsByYear W20176063632019 @default.
• W2017606363 countsByYear W20176063632020 @default.
• W2017606363 countsByYear W20176063632021 @default.
• W2017606363 countsByYear W20176063632022 @default.
• W2017606363 countsByYear W20176063632023 @default.
• W2017606363 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2017606363 hasAuthorship W2017606363A5001631222 @default.
• W2017606363 hasAuthorship W2017606363A5009520384 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConcept C157298493 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConcept C2775890777 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConcept C2776548248 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConcept C2776768071 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConcept C2778496695 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConceptScore W2017606363C111472728 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConceptScore W2017606363C121955636 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConceptScore W2017606363C138885662 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConceptScore W2017606363C144133560 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConceptScore W2017606363C157298493 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConceptScore W2017606363C15744967 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConceptScore W2017606363C17744445 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConceptScore W2017606363C199539241 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConceptScore W2017606363C2775890777 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConceptScore W2017606363C2776548248 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConceptScore W2017606363C2776768071 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConceptScore W2017606363C2778496695 @default.
• W2017606363 hasConceptScore W2017606363C77805123 @default.
• W2017606363 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2017606363 hasLocation W20176063631 @default.
• W2017606363 hasOpenAccess W2017606363 @default.
• W2017606363 hasPrimaryLocation W20176063631 @default.

• next