FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2025656600> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2025656600 endingPage "228" @default.
• W2025656600 startingPage "222" @default.
• W2025656600 abstract "Purpose: Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is reported to result in less initial patient morbidity and a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) when compared with conventional AAA repair. We sought to examine the durability of this result during the intermediate follow-up interval. Methods: The records of all admissions for all patients who underwent AAA repair during a 26-month interval were reviewed. Results: Three hundred thirty-seven (337) patients underwent procedures to repair AAAs (163 open and 174 endovascular). Endovascular procedures were performed with a variety of devices (Talent, 108; Ancure, 36; AneuRx, 26; Zenith, 2; and Cordis, 2) and configurations (141 bifurcated and 33 aortomonoiliac). The mean follow-up period was 10.6 months (endovascular repair) and 12.3 months (open repair). LOS did not significantly vary by device (P =.24 to P =.92) or configuration (P =.24). The initial median LOS for procedures was significantly shorter (P =.009) for endovascular repairs (5 days) than for open procedures (8 days). However, the patients who underwent endovascular repair were more likely to be readmitted during the follow-up interval when compared with patients who underwent open procedure. The readmission-free survival rate after AAA repair at 12 months was 95% for patients for open AAA repair versus 71% for patients for endovascular repair (P <.001). If the total hospital days were compared, including the initial and all subsequent AAA-related admissions, there was no significant difference for mean LOS for patients who underwent endovascular versus open AAA procedures (11 days versus 13.6 days; P =.21). The patients for endovascular AAA repair most commonly needed readmission for treatment of endoleak (n = 31), wound infection (n = 12), and graft limb thrombosis (n = 9). Although women had similar LOS to men for endovascular repair (P =.44), they had longer initial LOS for open AAA repair (15 versus 10 days; P =.03). After endovascular repair, women were more likely than men to be readmitted by 12 months (51% versus 71% readmission-free survival rate; P =.03) and they had longer LOS on readmission (13.2 versus 5.2 days; P =.006). No gender differences were identified for patients after open AAA repair regarding readmission-free survival rate (P =.09) or LOS on readmission (P =.98). Conclusion: Although initial LOS was shorter for the patients who underwent endovascular as compared with conventional AAA repair, this advantage was lost during the follow-up interval because of frequent readmission for the treatment of procedure-related complications, chiefly endoleak. These readmissions frequently involved the performance of additional invasive procedures. Gender differences existed regarding LOS and the likelihood of complications after open and endovascular AAA repair. (J Vasc Surg 2002;35:222-8.)" @default.
• W2025656600 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2025656600 creator A5012249337 @default.
• W2025656600 creator A5033528741 @default.
• W2025656600 creator A5049109639 @default.
• W2025656600 creator A5064361229 @default.
• W2025656600 creator A5072345671 @default.
• W2025656600 creator A5074811142 @default.
• W2025656600 creator A5088367060 @default.
• W2025656600 date "2002-02-01" @default.
• W2025656600 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2025656600 title "Durability of benefits of endovascular versus conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair" @default.
• W2025656600 cites W1964004366 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W1964794412 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W1976964631 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W1988070306 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W1989041228 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W1992953189 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W1995059855 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W1996271230 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W1998678835 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W1999665915 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2001324015 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2007915357 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2013047877 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2020178211 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2023709452 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2024422483 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2029908103 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2030852672 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2033741498 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2035855709 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2036678906 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2037298457 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2039329055 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2054969445 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2055143376 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2064038931 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2064119759 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2067243625 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2074519707 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2074931094 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2081831109 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2089081756 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2111515035 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2116125426 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2123956498 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2125371823 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2130274842 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2133191339 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2139043256 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2153766080 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2155474580 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2157274112 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W2160758830 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W4244625484 @default.
• W2025656600 cites W4250597454 @default.
• W2025656600 doi "https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.120034" @default.
• W2025656600 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11854718" @default.
• W2025656600 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2025656600 type Work @default.
• W2025656600 sameAs 2025656600 @default.
• W2025656600 citedByCount "102" @default.
• W2025656600 countsByYear W20256566002012 @default.
• W2025656600 countsByYear W20256566002013 @default.
• W2025656600 countsByYear W20256566002014 @default.
• W2025656600 countsByYear W20256566002015 @default.
• W2025656600 countsByYear W20256566002016 @default.
• W2025656600 countsByYear W20256566002017 @default.
• W2025656600 countsByYear W20256566002018 @default.
• W2025656600 countsByYear W20256566002019 @default.
• W2025656600 countsByYear W20256566002023 @default.
• W2025656600 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2025656600 hasAuthorship W2025656600A5012249337 @default.
• W2025656600 hasAuthorship W2025656600A5033528741 @default.
• W2025656600 hasAuthorship W2025656600A5049109639 @default.
• W2025656600 hasAuthorship W2025656600A5064361229 @default.
• W2025656600 hasAuthorship W2025656600A5072345671 @default.
• W2025656600 hasAuthorship W2025656600A5074811142 @default.
• W2025656600 hasAuthorship W2025656600A5088367060 @default.
• W2025656600 hasBestOaLocation W20256566001 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConcept C2776098176 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConcept C2776543907 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConcept C2779993416 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConcept C2994150672 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConcept C3018386432 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConceptScore W2025656600C126322002 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConceptScore W2025656600C141071460 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConceptScore W2025656600C2776098176 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConceptScore W2025656600C2776543907 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConceptScore W2025656600C2779993416 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConceptScore W2025656600C2994150672 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConceptScore W2025656600C3018386432 @default.
• W2025656600 hasConceptScore W2025656600C44249647 @default.

• next