FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2108462350> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2108462350 endingPage "1594" @default.
• W2108462350 startingPage "1586" @default.
• W2108462350 abstract "Purpose The purpose of the study was assessment of whether open reduction and internal fixation of high nondisplaced, nondislocated diacapitular fractures (Class VI according to Spiessl and Schroll) have better 1-year results compared with closed treatment. Patients and Methods Twenty-two patients treated 2001 to 2005 with 26 (4 double) Class VI fractures prospectively entered this evaluation; in randomized fashion 9 (41%) patients had open reduction and internal fixation, 13 (59%) had closed treatment. Facial symmetry, nerve function, scarring, pain, and interincisal maximum distance were judged clinically; condylar translation by sonography; repositioning and reossification upon postoperative and 1-year follow-up radiographs. Results Altogether 17 (77%) patients presented for follow-up; 8 (47%) closed treatment, 9 (53%) open reduction and internal fixation. All patients evinced normal vertical opening. Insufficient condylar translation (<6 mm opening, <3 mm protrusion and mediotrusion) was prevalent in 2 open reduction and internal fixation and 2 closed treatment patients, persistent pain in 2 open reduction and internal fixation patients, and deflection greater than 4 mm in 2 open reduction and internal fixation patients. Partial facial nerve paresis was not encountered. In 1 open reduction and internal fixation patient a broken osteofixation was removed and 1 closed treatment patient had dysocclusion. Vertical medial fragment position was successfully restored by open reduction and internal fixation with, however, considerable remodeling (lateral condyle support is unaltered in Class VI). Closed treatment did not succeed in vertical repositioning but also evinced less remodeling. Angular fragment rectification in open reduction and internal fixation was successful; in closed treatment slight enlargement of the angulation was encountered at follow-up. Conclusions Closed treatment within this study produced 2 of 8 (25%), open reduction and internal fixation compared with 2 of 9 (22%) unacceptable results and postoperative condyle remodeling. Therefore success rates of 75% versus 78% were attained, and closed treatment should therefore be preferred. However, sufficiently retentive resorbable osteofixation with intraosseous localization could permit better open reduction and internal fixation results than the microplates and screws at the dorsal condylar circumference applied within this study. The purpose of the study was assessment of whether open reduction and internal fixation of high nondisplaced, nondislocated diacapitular fractures (Class VI according to Spiessl and Schroll) have better 1-year results compared with closed treatment. Twenty-two patients treated 2001 to 2005 with 26 (4 double) Class VI fractures prospectively entered this evaluation; in randomized fashion 9 (41%) patients had open reduction and internal fixation, 13 (59%) had closed treatment. Facial symmetry, nerve function, scarring, pain, and interincisal maximum distance were judged clinically; condylar translation by sonography; repositioning and reossification upon postoperative and 1-year follow-up radiographs. Altogether 17 (77%) patients presented for follow-up; 8 (47%) closed treatment, 9 (53%) open reduction and internal fixation. All patients evinced normal vertical opening. Insufficient condylar translation (<6 mm opening, <3 mm protrusion and mediotrusion) was prevalent in 2 open reduction and internal fixation and 2 closed treatment patients, persistent pain in 2 open reduction and internal fixation patients, and deflection greater than 4 mm in 2 open reduction and internal fixation patients. Partial facial nerve paresis was not encountered. In 1 open reduction and internal fixation patient a broken osteofixation was removed and 1 closed treatment patient had dysocclusion. Vertical medial fragment position was successfully restored by open reduction and internal fixation with, however, considerable remodeling (lateral condyle support is unaltered in Class VI). Closed treatment did not succeed in vertical repositioning but also evinced less remodeling. Angular fragment rectification in open reduction and internal fixation was successful; in closed treatment slight enlargement of the angulation was encountered at follow-up. Closed treatment within this study produced 2 of 8 (25%), open reduction and internal fixation compared with 2 of 9 (22%) unacceptable results and postoperative condyle remodeling. Therefore success rates of 75% versus 78% were attained, and closed treatment should therefore be preferred. However, sufficiently retentive resorbable osteofixation with intraosseous localization could permit better open reduction and internal fixation results than the microplates and screws at the dorsal condylar circumference applied within this study." @default.
• W2108462350 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2108462350 creator A5028377767 @default.
• W2108462350 creator A5028614225 @default.
• W2108462350 creator A5052902192 @default.
• W2108462350 creator A5070146571 @default.
• W2108462350 date "2008-08-01" @default.
• W2108462350 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2108462350 title "Closed Versus Open Operative Treatment of Nondisplaced Diacapitular (Class VI) Fractures" @default.
• W2108462350 cites W1480488370 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W1547180414 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W1594350490 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W1975366263 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W1982183116 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W1985324772 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W1985927754 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W1998384542 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2007071952 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2017290950 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2024027095 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2044783980 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2046377104 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2052261088 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2053681580 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2065680067 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2069268733 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2072982024 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2078488449 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2081111734 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2082703806 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2093550592 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2096711877 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2101099137 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2103447873 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2106291680 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2120857248 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2136474899 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2146614048 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2168507576 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2740598723 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W2749881426 @default.
• W2108462350 cites W3007275031 @default.
• W2108462350 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.668" @default.
• W2108462350 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18634944" @default.
• W2108462350 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2108462350 type Work @default.
• W2108462350 sameAs 2108462350 @default.
• W2108462350 citedByCount "47" @default.
• W2108462350 countsByYear W21084623502012 @default.
• W2108462350 countsByYear W21084623502013 @default.
• W2108462350 countsByYear W21084623502015 @default.
• W2108462350 countsByYear W21084623502016 @default.
• W2108462350 countsByYear W21084623502017 @default.
• W2108462350 countsByYear W21084623502018 @default.
• W2108462350 countsByYear W21084623502019 @default.
• W2108462350 countsByYear W21084623502020 @default.
• W2108462350 countsByYear W21084623502021 @default.
• W2108462350 countsByYear W21084623502022 @default.
• W2108462350 countsByYear W21084623502023 @default.
• W2108462350 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2108462350 hasAuthorship W2108462350A5028377767 @default.
• W2108462350 hasAuthorship W2108462350A5028614225 @default.
• W2108462350 hasAuthorship W2108462350A5052902192 @default.
• W2108462350 hasAuthorship W2108462350A5070146571 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConcept C111335779 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConcept C2780660378 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConcept C96646087 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConceptScore W2108462350C111335779 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConceptScore W2108462350C141071460 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConceptScore W2108462350C146249460 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConceptScore W2108462350C2524010 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConceptScore W2108462350C2780660378 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConceptScore W2108462350C2908647359 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConceptScore W2108462350C33923547 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConceptScore W2108462350C71924100 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConceptScore W2108462350C96646087 @default.
• W2108462350 hasConceptScore W2108462350C99454951 @default.
• W2108462350 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2108462350 hasLocation W21084623501 @default.
• W2108462350 hasLocation W21084623502 @default.
• W2108462350 hasOpenAccess W2108462350 @default.
• W2108462350 hasPrimaryLocation W21084623501 @default.
• W2108462350 hasRelatedWork W1479871144 @default.
• W2108462350 hasRelatedWork W2020834304 @default.
• W2108462350 hasRelatedWork W2233408974 @default.
• W2108462350 hasRelatedWork W2349650241 @default.
• W2108462350 hasRelatedWork W2367328649 @default.
• W2108462350 hasRelatedWork W2431044021 @default.
• W2108462350 hasRelatedWork W2508441513 @default.
• W2108462350 hasRelatedWork W2510734378 @default.
• W2108462350 hasRelatedWork W2809370011 @default.

• next