FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2109678411> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2109678411 endingPage "388" @default.
• W2109678411 startingPage "357" @default.
• W2109678411 abstract "The separated turbulent flow past an inclined flat plate with sharp leading and trailing edges was computed based on three different simulation approaches for a reynolds number Rec= 20000 and a high angle of attack α=18°. The simulation techniques applied were the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations combined with a one-equation Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model, the large-eddy simulation (LES) based on an algebraic eddy-viscosity model, and a hybrid approach known as detached-eddy simulation (DES) applying a slightly modified Spalart–Allmaras model in the entire integration domain. DES is a non-zonal coupling technique of RANS and LES developed in the hope of reducing the large computational resources required for LES computations of turbulent flows with practical relevance. However, the objective of the present study was not to compare the resources (CPU time, memory) required for all three techniques but to investigate and evaluate the quality of the predicted results for RANS, DES and LES. For this purpose, a test case which is favourable to the basic concept of DES and which places special emphasis on the LES part of the DES concept was chosen. This last issue was important since the modified Spalart–Allmaras model applied as a subgrid scale model in the LES part is not as well validated as other models usually applied in LES. For this purpose, an LES prediction on a very fine grid served as a reference case for the evaluation. For all three techniques, predictions with different grid resolutions were carried out and compared with each other based on important integral parameters (e.g. Strouhal number, mean drag and lift coefficients and their standard deviations), the instantaneous and time-averaged flow structures, and higher-order statistics. As expected, the pure RANS calculation, although applied as unsteady RANS, failed to predict the unsteady characteristics of the separated flow. In contrast, the DES approach yielded reasonably the shedding phenomenon and some integral parameters. However, analysing the results in more detail led to remarkable deviations between the DES and LES predictions also when the same grid resolution was applied. Especially the free shear layer originating from the leading edge of the plate was not well reproduced by DES, showing strong deficiencies of the model applied as a subgrid scale model. The reasons for this behaviour of the model were analysed in detail. Two basic causes were identified; the first is given by some near-wall corrections in the finite Reynolds number version of the model which are not working properly in the LES mode of DES. The second is a modified definition of the filter width typically applied for DES, leading to strongly increased values of the eddy viscosity. A revised version of the S–A model taking both issues seriously into account was used as a subgrid scale model in the LES mode. As a direct consequence, much better agreement with the reference LES solution was found for the DES prediction on the coarse grid, eliminating the deficiencies of the original formulation. Copyright© 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd." @default.
• W2109678411 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2109678411 creator A5014840198 @default.
• W2109678411 creator A5022655543 @default.
• W2109678411 creator A5071329571 @default.
• W2109678411 date "2003-01-01" @default.
• W2109678411 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2109678411 title "Comparison of DES, RANS and LES for the separated flow around a flat plate at high incidence" @default.
• W2109678411 cites W113505387 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W1568605190 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W168003309 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W187418866 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2028943644 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2032554758 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2034644845 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2035545087 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2045244586 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2053708239 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2062712788 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2064828223 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2068109311 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2074447412 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2111851584 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2118766907 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2130424894 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2148137365 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2164580999 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2168795429 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W2247809861 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W4240023291 @default.
• W2109678411 cites W431910415 @default.
• W2109678411 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.445" @default.
• W2109678411 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2109678411 type Work @default.
• W2109678411 sameAs 2109678411 @default.
• W2109678411 citedByCount "175" @default.
• W2109678411 countsByYear W21096784112012 @default.
• W2109678411 countsByYear W21096784112013 @default.
• W2109678411 countsByYear W21096784112014 @default.
• W2109678411 countsByYear W21096784112015 @default.
• W2109678411 countsByYear W21096784112016 @default.
• W2109678411 countsByYear W21096784112017 @default.
• W2109678411 countsByYear W21096784112018 @default.
• W2109678411 countsByYear W21096784112019 @default.
• W2109678411 countsByYear W21096784112020 @default.
• W2109678411 countsByYear W21096784112021 @default.
• W2109678411 countsByYear W21096784112022 @default.
• W2109678411 countsByYear W21096784112023 @default.
• W2109678411 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2109678411 hasAuthorship W2109678411A5014840198 @default.
• W2109678411 hasAuthorship W2109678411A5022655543 @default.
• W2109678411 hasAuthorship W2109678411A5071329571 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConcept C121129557 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConcept C121448008 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConcept C1633027 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConcept C196558001 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConcept C204573209 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConcept C32526432 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConcept C38349280 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConcept C57879066 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConceptScore W2109678411C121129557 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConceptScore W2109678411C121332964 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConceptScore W2109678411C121448008 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConceptScore W2109678411C1633027 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConceptScore W2109678411C196558001 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConceptScore W2109678411C204573209 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConceptScore W2109678411C32526432 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConceptScore W2109678411C33923547 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConceptScore W2109678411C38349280 @default.
• W2109678411 hasConceptScore W2109678411C57879066 @default.
• W2109678411 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2109678411 hasLocation W21096784111 @default.
• W2109678411 hasOpenAccess W2109678411 @default.
• W2109678411 hasPrimaryLocation W21096784111 @default.
• W2109678411 hasRelatedWork W139530403 @default.
• W2109678411 hasRelatedWork W2083033204 @default.
• W2109678411 hasRelatedWork W2119761404 @default.
• W2109678411 hasRelatedWork W2186318038 @default.
• W2109678411 hasRelatedWork W2366556349 @default.
• W2109678411 hasRelatedWork W2382654620 @default.
• W2109678411 hasRelatedWork W2554666141 @default.
• W2109678411 hasRelatedWork W2608178629 @default.
• W2109678411 hasRelatedWork W2904670957 @default.
• W2109678411 hasRelatedWork W3170354299 @default.
• W2109678411 hasVolume "41" @default.
• W2109678411 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2109678411 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2109678411 magId "2109678411" @default.
• W2109678411 workType "article" @default.