FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2621152322> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2621152322 endingPage "1038" @default.
• W2621152322 startingPage "1030" @default.
• W2621152322 abstract "Background: Anterior glenoid reconstruction with fresh distal tibia allograft (DTA) has been described for management of recurrent shoulder instability, with encouraging early outcomes; however, no comparative data with the Latarjet procedure are available. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between patients undergoing DTA and a matched cohort of patients undergoing Latarjet. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A review was conducted of prospectively collected data for patients with a minimum 15% anterior glenoid bone loss who underwent shoulder stabilization via either the DTA or Latarjet procedure and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Consecutive patients undergoing DTA were matched in a 1-to-1 format to patients undergoing Latarjet by age, body mass index, history of contact sports, and number of previous shoulder operations. Patients were evaluated pre- and postoperatively with a physical examination and the following outcome assessments: Simple Shoulder Test, visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. Complications, reoperations, and episodes of recurrent instability were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with Student t tests, with P < .05 considered significant. Results: A total of 100 patients (50 Latarjet, 50 DTA) with a mean ± SD age of 25.6 ± 6.1 years were analyzed at 45 ± 20 months (range, 24-111) after surgery. Thirty-two patients (64%) in each group underwent prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery (range, 1-3). Patients undergoing DTA had significantly greater glenoid bone loss defects when compared with patients undergoing Latarjet (28.6% ± 7.4% vs 22.4% ± 10.3%, P = .001). Patients in both groups experienced significant improvements in all outcome scores after surgery ( P < .05 for all). No significant differences were found in postoperative scores between the Latarjet and DTA groups: visual analog scale (0.67 ± 0.97 vs 1.83 ± 2.31), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (91.06 ± 8.78 vs 89.74 ± 12.66), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (74.30 ± 21.84 vs 89.69 ± 5.50), or Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (80.68 ± 7.21 vs 90.08 ± 13.39) ( P > .05 for all). However, patients in the Latarjet group had superior Simple Shoulder Test outcomes ( P = .011). There were 10 complications (10%) for the entire cohort, including 5 in the Latarjet group (3 of which required reoperation) and 5 in the DTA group (3 of which required reoperation). The overall recurrent instability rate was 1% (1 patient). Conclusion: Fresh DTA reconstruction for recurrent anterior shoulder instability results in a clinically stable joint with similar clinical outcomes as the Latarjet procedure. Longer-term studies are needed to determine if these results are maintained over time." @default.
• W2621152322 created "2017-06-09" @default.
• W2621152322 creator A5008278476 @default.
• W2621152322 creator A5023738696 @default.
• W2621152322 creator A5055128851 @default.
• W2621152322 creator A5062004286 @default.
• W2621152322 creator A5064391561 @default.
• W2621152322 creator A5068043288 @default.
• W2621152322 creator A5072171722 @default.
• W2621152322 creator A5075347718 @default.
• W2621152322 date "2018-02-01" @default.
• W2621152322 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2621152322 title "Outcomes of Latarjet Versus Distal Tibia Allograft for Anterior Shoulder Instability Repair: A Matched Cohort Analysis" @default.
• W2621152322 cites W1970124280 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W1982322637 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W1994626394 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W1995804940 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2008981643 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2018452585 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2048290032 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2048641923 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2050738042 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2055090547 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2059424967 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2080979790 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2094965654 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2096473481 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2101463478 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2112269066 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2115546662 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2117498332 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2122718539 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2136729993 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2138096523 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2141468562 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2146740613 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2147677961 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2147899020 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2152002597 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2155709370 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2157431495 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2158580991 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2159261305 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2159311858 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2161348833 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2162264637 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2162506557 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2162728003 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2165063661 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2166310264 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2177907235 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2308349407 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2323252081 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2461978509 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2462886392 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2511667462 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2530037135 @default.
• W2621152322 cites W2561883334 @default.
• W2621152322 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517744203" @default.
• W2621152322 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5542332" @default.
• W2621152322 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29389219" @default.
• W2621152322 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2621152322 type Work @default.
• W2621152322 sameAs 2621152322 @default.
• W2621152322 citedByCount "67" @default.
• W2621152322 countsByYear W26211523222018 @default.
• W2621152322 countsByYear W26211523222019 @default.
• W2621152322 countsByYear W26211523222020 @default.
• W2621152322 countsByYear W26211523222021 @default.
• W2621152322 countsByYear W26211523222022 @default.
• W2621152322 countsByYear W26211523222023 @default.
• W2621152322 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2621152322 hasAuthorship W2621152322A5008278476 @default.
• W2621152322 hasAuthorship W2621152322A5023738696 @default.
• W2621152322 hasAuthorship W2621152322A5055128851 @default.
• W2621152322 hasAuthorship W2621152322A5062004286 @default.
• W2621152322 hasAuthorship W2621152322A5064391561 @default.
• W2621152322 hasAuthorship W2621152322A5068043288 @default.
• W2621152322 hasAuthorship W2621152322A5072171722 @default.
• W2621152322 hasAuthorship W2621152322A5075347718 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConcept C2777307732 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConcept C2778436160 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConcept C527108885 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConceptScore W2621152322C126322002 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConceptScore W2621152322C141071460 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConceptScore W2621152322C14184104 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConceptScore W2621152322C167135981 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConceptScore W2621152322C201903717 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConceptScore W2621152322C2777307732 @default.
• W2621152322 hasConceptScore W2621152322C2778436160 @default.

• next