FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2904634426> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2904634426 endingPage "232596711881607" @default.
• W2904634426 startingPage "232596711881607" @default.
• W2904634426 abstract "Olecranon osteotomies are frequently performed to gain access to the distal humeral articular surface. Repair of the osteotomy or fixation of a simple 2-part olecranon fracture with traditional tension band construct is often plagued by complication. Proximal migration and irritation attributed to hardware are common complications of the standard construct of an intramedullary screw with tension band and are causes for reoperation.To compare the biomechanical performance, time of implant, and prominence of an intramedullary screw and tension band construct with that of a newer low-profile continuous loop tension band (Olecranon Sled) construct in an olecranon osteotomy model.Controlled laboratory study.Chevron osteotomies were created in 6 matched pairs of fresh-frozen human elbows (mean age, 66 ± 16 years). Each matched pair was then randomly divided into 1 of 2 groups: fixation with a screw and tension band construct or the Olecranon Sled. Bone mineral density, implant prominence, and time for implantation were recorded. Following olecranon fixation, each specimen underwent cyclic loading of 0 to 10 N for 100 cycles (to simulate unresisted active range of motion) and then 0 to 500 N for 500 cycles (to simulate pushing up from a chair) to measure for any displacement at the osteotomy site. The constructs were then loaded to failure and compared.No differences were found in bone mineral density between the 2 groups (P = .290). When measured from the tip of the olecranon, the continuous loop tension band had a medial prominence of only 3.57 ± 0.4 mm, as opposed to the intramedullary screw fixation of 7.288 ± 0.762 mm (P = .027). Total time of implantation, including osteotomy preparation, was a mean 155 seconds shorter with the Olecranon Sled versus the traditional tension band (P < .05). Because of the fracture of 1 specimen during cyclic loading, it and its matched counterpart were excluded, and only 5 matched pairs were analyzed for displacement and load to failure. There were no significant differences between groups in load to failure or displacement during cyclic loading (P > .05).The Olecranon Sled device was found to have no difference in biomechanical strength from that of the standard intramedullary screw with tension band construct. The Olecranon Sled was also found to be significantly less prominent while being faster to implant than the intramedullary screw.Evaluating an alternative option to the standard tension band construct is important for patients with olecranon fractures or osteotomies, as standard techniques have been fraught with hardware issues and need for revision surgery." @default.
• W2904634426 created "2018-12-22" @default.
• W2904634426 creator A5014669266 @default.
• W2904634426 creator A5032913544 @default.
• W2904634426 creator A5043031975 @default.
• W2904634426 creator A5055073429 @default.
• W2904634426 creator A5058266900 @default.
• W2904634426 creator A5074350155 @default.
• W2904634426 creator A5076829228 @default.
• W2904634426 date "2018-12-01" @default.
• W2904634426 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2904634426 title "Biomechanical Comparison of Olecranon Sled Versus Intramedullary Screw Tension Banding for Olecranon Osteotomies" @default.
• W2904634426 cites W1913603547 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W1996470498 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2032267086 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2032310432 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2038207866 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2040196078 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2042750946 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2044499025 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2045074791 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2065876028 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2067206032 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2071559535 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2073161777 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2075145329 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2082982987 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2121924103 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2139158908 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2151929835 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2319998393 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2742659212 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W2773308764 @default.
• W2904634426 cites W4238204681 @default.
• W2904634426 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118816075" @default.
• W2904634426 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6299312" @default.
• W2904634426 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30574518" @default.
• W2904634426 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2904634426 type Work @default.
• W2904634426 sameAs 2904634426 @default.
• W2904634426 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2904634426 countsByYear W29046344262022 @default.
• W2904634426 countsByYear W29046344262023 @default.
• W2904634426 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2904634426 hasAuthorship W2904634426A5014669266 @default.
• W2904634426 hasAuthorship W2904634426A5032913544 @default.
• W2904634426 hasAuthorship W2904634426A5043031975 @default.
• W2904634426 hasAuthorship W2904634426A5055073429 @default.
• W2904634426 hasAuthorship W2904634426A5058266900 @default.
• W2904634426 hasAuthorship W2904634426A5074350155 @default.
• W2904634426 hasAuthorship W2904634426A5076829228 @default.
• W2904634426 hasBestOaLocation W29046344261 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConcept C2776389721 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConcept C2780474965 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConcept C2780711802 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConcept C92162645 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConceptScore W2904634426C141071460 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConceptScore W2904634426C146249460 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConceptScore W2904634426C2776389721 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConceptScore W2904634426C2780474965 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConceptScore W2904634426C2780711802 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConceptScore W2904634426C2781184374 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConceptScore W2904634426C2781411149 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConceptScore W2904634426C2908647359 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConceptScore W2904634426C29694066 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConceptScore W2904634426C71924100 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConceptScore W2904634426C92162645 @default.
• W2904634426 hasConceptScore W2904634426C99454951 @default.
• W2904634426 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W2904634426 hasLocation W29046344261 @default.
• W2904634426 hasLocation W29046344262 @default.
• W2904634426 hasLocation W29046344263 @default.
• W2904634426 hasLocation W29046344264 @default.
• W2904634426 hasOpenAccess W2904634426 @default.
• W2904634426 hasPrimaryLocation W29046344261 @default.
• W2904634426 hasRelatedWork W2019995501 @default.
• W2904634426 hasRelatedWork W2058867367 @default.
• W2904634426 hasRelatedWork W2092331311 @default.
• W2904634426 hasRelatedWork W2127575264 @default.
• W2904634426 hasRelatedWork W2351450012 @default.
• W2904634426 hasRelatedWork W2519645322 @default.
• W2904634426 hasRelatedWork W3030328865 @default.
• W2904634426 hasRelatedWork W3035747059 @default.
• W2904634426 hasRelatedWork W4225353291 @default.
• W2904634426 hasRelatedWork W4367394781 @default.
• W2904634426 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W2904634426 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2904634426 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2904634426 magId "2904634426" @default.
• W2904634426 workType "article" @default.