FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4238847929> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4238847929 endingPage "268" @default.
• W4238847929 startingPage "264" @default.
• W4238847929 abstract "To test the null hypothesis that no correlation exists between transvaginal digital examination compared with the gold standard technique of transabdominal suprapubic ultrasound assessment of fetal head position during the second stage of labor. A secondary objective was to compare the performance of attending physicians vs. senior residents in depicting fetal head position by transvaginal digital examination in comparison with ultrasound assessment.Consecutive patients in the second-stage of labor at term with normal singleton cephalic-presenting fetuses and ruptured membranes were included. Transvaginal digital examinations were performed by either attending physicians or senior residents and were followed immediately by transverse suprapubic transabdominal sonographic assessments performed by a single sonographer. Examiners were blinded to each other's findings. Power analysis dictated sample size. Exact binomial confidence intervals around observed rates were compared with chi 2 and Cohen's kappa-tests. Logistic regression was applied. P < 0.05 was considered significant throughout.One hundred and twelve patients were studied. The absolute error of transvaginal digital examinations was recorded in 65% of patients (95% confidence interval, 56-74%). Parity, pelvic station, combined spinal epidural anesthesia, length of first or second stages of labor, use of oxytocin augmentation, gestational age, mode of delivery, birth weight, and examiner experience did not significantly affect examination accuracy. Stratification, when the transvaginal digital examination was recorded as correct if occurring within +/- 45 degrees of the ultrasound assessment, reduced the error of the transvaginal digital examinations to 39% (95% confidence interval, 30-49%). Independent variables again did not affect examination accuracy in this assessment modality. Rates of agreement between the two methods for attending physicians compared with residents were not significantly different. The overall degrees of agreement were 40% (95% confidence interval, 26-55%) and 68% (95% confidence interval, 53-80%) (kappa = 0.25 and 0.30) for the absolute agreement and +/- 45 degrees assessment modalities, respectively, for attending physicians, and 31% (95% confidence interval, 20-44%) and 55% (95% confidence interval, 42-68%) (kappa = 0.14 and 0.12) for senior residents.Using ultrasound assessment as the gold standard, our data demonstrate a high rate of error (65%) in transvaginal digital determination of fetal head position during the second stage of labor. The performance of senior residents in transvaginal digital examinations did not differ significantly from that of attending physicians. Intrapartum ultrasound increases the accuracy of fetal head position assessment during the second stage of labor." @default.
• W4238847929 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4238847929 creator A5022093370 @default.
• W4238847929 creator A5061152811 @default.
• W4238847929 creator A5074609201 @default.
• W4238847929 creator A5087101736 @default.
• W4238847929 date "2002-03-01" @default.
• W4238847929 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W4238847929 title "Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor" @default.
• W4238847929 cites W2073108970 @default.
• W4238847929 cites W2080727317 @default.
• W4238847929 cites W2199569642 @default.
• W4238847929 cites W2569136646 @default.
• W4238847929 cites W4238847929 @default.
• W4238847929 doi "https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x" @default.
• W4238847929 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11896948" @default.
• W4238847929 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W4238847929 type Work @default.
• W4238847929 citedByCount "214" @default.
• W4238847929 countsByYear W42388479292012 @default.
• W4238847929 countsByYear W42388479292013 @default.
• W4238847929 countsByYear W42388479292014 @default.
• W4238847929 countsByYear W42388479292015 @default.
• W4238847929 countsByYear W42388479292016 @default.
• W4238847929 countsByYear W42388479292017 @default.
• W4238847929 countsByYear W42388479292018 @default.
• W4238847929 countsByYear W42388479292019 @default.
• W4238847929 countsByYear W42388479292020 @default.
• W4238847929 countsByYear W42388479292021 @default.
• W4238847929 countsByYear W42388479292022 @default.
• W4238847929 countsByYear W42388479292023 @default.
• W4238847929 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4238847929 hasAuthorship W4238847929A5022093370 @default.
• W4238847929 hasAuthorship W4238847929A5061152811 @default.
• W4238847929 hasAuthorship W4238847929A5074609201 @default.
• W4238847929 hasAuthorship W4238847929A5087101736 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C172680121 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C2778376644 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C2778941581 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C2779811377 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C54942250 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C126322002 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C126838900 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C131872663 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C143753070 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C172680121 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C2778376644 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C2778941581 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C2779234561 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C2779811377 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C29456083 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C44249647 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C54355233 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C54942250 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C71924100 @default.
• W4238847929 hasConceptScore W4238847929C86803240 @default.
• W4238847929 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4238847929 hasLocation W42388479291 @default.
• W4238847929 hasLocation W42388479292 @default.
• W4238847929 hasOpenAccess W4238847929 @default.
• W4238847929 hasPrimaryLocation W42388479291 @default.
• W4238847929 hasRelatedWork W1993478148 @default.
• W4238847929 hasRelatedWork W2009456537 @default.
• W4238847929 hasRelatedWork W2012748005 @default.
• W4238847929 hasRelatedWork W2026210599 @default.
• W4238847929 hasRelatedWork W2028485816 @default.
• W4238847929 hasRelatedWork W2052395824 @default.
• W4238847929 hasRelatedWork W2327602378 @default.
• W4238847929 hasRelatedWork W2596321287 @default.
• W4238847929 hasRelatedWork W4220973886 @default.
• W4238847929 hasRelatedWork W4247344314 @default.
• W4238847929 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W4238847929 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4238847929 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4238847929 workType "article" @default.