Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4245485862> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 58 of
58
with 100 items per page.
- W4245485862 endingPage "860" @default.
- W4245485862 startingPage "859" @default.
- W4245485862 abstract "Thank you for your interest in our paper “Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice”. Although 29 patients is a relatively small sample size, our study adds to the growing body of literature showing the good sensitivity and specificity of the frequency doubling technology in detecting visual field loss. In particular, our study looked at frequency doubling technology in screening and threshold modes. There may be some misunderstanding as to how we used the frequency doubling technology classification for severity of visual field loss. The categories of mild, moderate, or severe defects, as provided by the frequency doubling technology, were used to determine a useful cutoff to use with the frequency doubling technology; that is, should people with any defect (mild, moderate, or severe) be considered as positive for glaucoma on the screening test, or would it be better to consider only those with moderate or severe defects? We did not evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the frequency doubling technology by severity of visual field defects, as determined by Humphrey visual field analysis. Table 1 provided the definitions we used in Figure 1. “Mild” defects refer to a broad definition of mild, moderate, or severe loss, as determined by the frequency doubling technology. “Moderate” includes moderate or severe defects, and “severe” is the most stringent category, which includes only those with severe relative loss. As stated in the first paragraph of page 330, “As the criterion for an abnormal result of frequency doubling perimetry in screening mode became more stringent, from requiring any defect to requiring severe defects to define an abnormal case, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve decreased for all definitions of an abnormal Humphrey visual field.” Our results cannot be compared with the results of Cello and associates. We did not evaluate sensitivity and specificity in terms of severity of defects, which is what Cello and colleagues did in their study." @default.
- W4245485862 created "2022-05-12" @default.
- W4245485862 creator A5015619058 @default.
- W4245485862 creator A5054352957 @default.
- W4245485862 creator A5079192725 @default.
- W4245485862 date "2000-12-01" @default.
- W4245485862 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W4245485862 title "Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice: The reply" @default.
- W4245485862 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00867-9" @default.
- W4245485862 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
- W4245485862 type Work @default.
- W4245485862 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4245485862 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4245485862 hasAuthorship W4245485862A5015619058 @default.
- W4245485862 hasAuthorship W4245485862A5054352957 @default.
- W4245485862 hasAuthorship W4245485862A5079192725 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConcept C202751555 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConcept C2776058522 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConcept C2778527774 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConcept C2908575184 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConcept C48900799 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConceptScore W4245485862C118487528 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConceptScore W4245485862C119767625 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConceptScore W4245485862C185592680 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConceptScore W4245485862C202751555 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConceptScore W4245485862C2776058522 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConceptScore W4245485862C2778527774 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConceptScore W4245485862C2908575184 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConceptScore W4245485862C48900799 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConceptScore W4245485862C548259974 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConceptScore W4245485862C55493867 @default.
- W4245485862 hasConceptScore W4245485862C71924100 @default.
- W4245485862 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W4245485862 hasLocation W42454858621 @default.
- W4245485862 hasOpenAccess W4245485862 @default.
- W4245485862 hasPrimaryLocation W42454858621 @default.
- W4245485862 hasRelatedWork W1974277164 @default.
- W4245485862 hasRelatedWork W2015919127 @default.
- W4245485862 hasRelatedWork W2016676958 @default.
- W4245485862 hasRelatedWork W2020156363 @default.
- W4245485862 hasRelatedWork W2030985286 @default.
- W4245485862 hasRelatedWork W2148095256 @default.
- W4245485862 hasRelatedWork W2165280441 @default.
- W4245485862 hasRelatedWork W2288036464 @default.
- W4245485862 hasRelatedWork W2378508981 @default.
- W4245485862 hasRelatedWork W2585004083 @default.
- W4245485862 hasVolume "130" @default.
- W4245485862 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4245485862 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4245485862 workType "article" @default.