FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4386971335> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4386971335 abstract "<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Teletherapy apps have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional in-person therapy, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, as they help overcome a range of geographical and emotional barriers to accessing care. However, the rapid proliferation of teletherapy apps has occurred in an environment in which development has outpaced the various regulatory and ethical considerations of this space. Thus, researchers have raised concerns about the ethical implications and potential risks of teletherapy apps given the lack of regulation and oversight. Teletherapy apps have distinct aims to more directly replicate practices of traditional care, as opposed to mental health apps, which primarily provide supplemental support, suggesting a need to examine the ethical considerations of teletherapy apps from the lens of existing ethical guidelines for providing therapy. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> In this study, we examined user reviews of commercial teletherapy apps to understand user perceptions of whether and how ethical principles are followed and incorporated. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We identified 8 mobile apps that (1) provided teletherapy on 2 dominant mobile app stores (Google Play and Apple App Store) and (2) had received &gt;5000 app reviews on both app stores. We wrote Python scripts (Python Software Foundation) to scrape user reviews from the 8 apps, collecting 3268 user reviews combined across 2 app stores. We used thematic analysis to qualitatively analyze user reviews, developing a codebook drawing from the ethical codes of conduct for psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> The qualitative analysis of user reviews revealed the ethical concerns and opportunities of teletherapy app users. Users frequently perceived unprofessionalism in their teletherapists, mentioning that their therapists did not listen to them, were distracted during therapy sessions, and did not keep their appointments. Users also noted technical glitches and therapist unavailability on teletherapy apps that might affect their ability to provide continuity of care. Users held varied opinions on the affordability of those apps, with some perceiving them as affordable and others not. Users further brought up that the subscription model resulted in unfair pricing and expressed concerns about the lack of cost transparency. Users perceived that these apps could help promote access to care by overcoming geographical and social constraints. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Our study suggests that users perceive commercial teletherapy apps as adhering to many ethical principles pertaining to therapy but falling short in key areas regarding professionalism, continuity of care, cost fairness, and cost transparency. Our findings suggest that, to provide high-quality care, teletherapy apps should prioritize fair compensation for therapists, develop more flexible and transparent payment models, and invest in measures to ensure app stability and therapist availability. Future work is needed to develop standards for teletherapy and improve the quality and accessibility of those services. </sec>" @default.
• W4386971335 created "2023-09-23" @default.
• W4386971335 creator A5013359305 @default.
• W4386971335 creator A5015228589 @default.
• W4386971335 creator A5088906729 @default.
• W4386971335 creator A5092626365 @default.
• W4386971335 date "2023-06-05" @default.
• W4386971335 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W4386971335 title "Exploring User Perspectives of and Ethical Experiences With Teletherapy Apps: Qualitative Analysis of User Reviews (Preprint)" @default.
• W4386971335 cites W1965001891 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W1995694274 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2128900442 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2259766474 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2319316515 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2325243703 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2510736571 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2515676802 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2569031557 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2604372657 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2750745394 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2783640634 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2800072875 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2805939587 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2902996901 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2954915517 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2996476125 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W2999181723 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W3013038708 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W3027881306 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W3033765777 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W3035127876 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W3095643131 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W3110201756 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W3161593506 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W3206284518 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W4206616875 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W4224982031 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W4225016416 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W4235499962 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W4245380108 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W4249935330 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W4309618075 @default.
• W4386971335 cites W4309618418 @default.
• W4386971335 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.49684" @default.
• W4386971335 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4386971335 type Work @default.
• W4386971335 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4386971335 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4386971335 hasAuthorship W4386971335A5013359305 @default.
• W4386971335 hasAuthorship W4386971335A5015228589 @default.
• W4386971335 hasAuthorship W4386971335A5088906729 @default.
• W4386971335 hasAuthorship W4386971335A5092626365 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C2779794324 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C2779930795 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C2988145974 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C108827166 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C136764020 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C144024400 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C15744967 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C190248442 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C2779794324 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C2779930795 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C2988145974 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C36289849 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C41008148 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C509550671 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C71924100 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C74196892 @default.
• W4386971335 hasConceptScore W4386971335C77805123 @default.
• W4386971335 hasLocation W43869713351 @default.
• W4386971335 hasOpenAccess W4386971335 @default.
• W4386971335 hasPrimaryLocation W43869713351 @default.
• W4386971335 hasRelatedWork W184881239 @default.
• W4386971335 hasRelatedWork W2730608559 @default.
• W4386971335 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4386971335 hasRelatedWork W2808363712 @default.
• W4386971335 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4386971335 hasRelatedWork W3003683622 @default.
• W4386971335 hasRelatedWork W4293723000 @default.
• W4386971335 hasRelatedWork W4380993336 @default.
• W4386971335 hasRelatedWork W4385412223 @default.
• W4386971335 hasRelatedWork W4385953535 @default.
• W4386971335 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4386971335 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4386971335 workType "article" @default.