Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/almd;;2:16-cr-00214_de74> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- almd;;2:16-cr-00214_de74 RegisterActionDate "2018-04-04" @default.
- almd;;2:16-cr-00214_de74 RegisterActionDescriptionText "JUDGMENT ISSUED AS MANDATE 04/04/2018 of USCA (certified copy) as to E75D4E3 re 67 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment, 11th Circuit Appeal No. 17-13243-HH ; In short, the district court did not ignore a relevant factor, emphasize an improper factor, or unreasonably weigh the relevant factors, and, therefore, did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See Irey, 612 F.3d at 1189. As weve said many times before, we ordinarily expect a sentence within the Guideline range -- like this one -- to be reasonable, and E75D4E3 has not met his burden of establishing that, in light of the entire record, the § 3553(a) factors, and the deference owed to the district court, his sentence at the low end of the Guideline range was unreasonable. See Hunt, 526 F.3d at 746; Rosales-Bruno, 789 F.3d at 1256. Accordingly, we affirm. AFFIRMED. See USCA 77 Per Curiam Opinion entered on 03/06/2018. (ydw, ) (Entered: 04/04/2018)" @default.
- almd;;2:16-cr-00214_de74 AdministrativeID "78" @default.
- almd;;2:16-cr-00214_de74 OntologyLabel judgment @default.
- almd;;2:16-cr-00214_de74 hasReferenceToOtherEntry almd;;2:16-cr-00214_de63 @default.
- almd;;2:16-cr-00214_de74 hasReferenceToOtherEntry almd;;2:16-cr-00214_de73 @default.