Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cr-00352_de31> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cr-00352_de31 RegisterActionDate "2017-01-31" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cr-00352_de31 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER granting 32 Motion to Continue as to 578DCB0 (1) Motions due by 3/13/2017. Responses due by 4/3/2017 Jury Trial set for 5/1/2017 09:00 AM in Room 323 (Grand Junction) before Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Pretrial Conference set for 4/27/2017 03:30 PM in Courtroom A 901 before Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Defendant moved to continue the trial on the basis that there was not enough time to be properly prepared for trial on March 6, 2017. The reasons for the continuance include: On January 27, 2017, the Government informed the Defense that the Government would be pursuing a superseding indictment incorporating a pending state action into the instant case. Subsequent to that indictment, the Government would be providing discovery with regard to the new count(s) should the Government be successful in acquiring the indictment. In addition, Defense Counsel indicates that she has been conducting necessary research for motions but was sick for approximately two weeks, thus delaying that process. The Court, examining the factors set forth in U.S. v. Toombs, 574 F.3d 1262 (10th Cir. 2009) and 18 USC § 3161, determines that the ends of justice would be served by continuing the trial in this matter and that the factors in favor of granting such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial. The Court finds that failure to grant such a continuance would make it impossible for the Defense to proceed, would provide inadequate preparation time taking into account the fact that the parties have all exercised due diligence. The Government did not object, in any fashion, to the motion to continue. All time between the just vacated trial date of March, 2017 and the new date of May 1, 2017 shall be excluded from the speedy trial calculation. The parties are to file a joint memo, within 14 days, providing a current speedy trial calculation. No later than April 1, 2017, the parties shall file an estimate of the time needed for trial (jointly if in agreement and separately if necessary). by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/31/17. Text Only Entry (ggall, ) (Entered: 01/31/2017)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cr-00352_de31 AdministrativeID "33" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cr-00352_de31 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cr-00352_de31 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cr-00352_de30 @default.