Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-00581_de145> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00581_de145 RegisterActionDate "2017-03-08" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00581_de145 RegisterActionDescriptionText "AMENDED ORDER granting in part 97 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony from Sheriff Joe DiSalvo, Deputy Monique Merritt, and Dr. Betty McGuigan. Granted as to Sheriff DeSalvo. FRE 402 and 403. The Court finds that the relevance of this evidence, if an y, is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Also improper disclosure under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C). Granted as to Deputy Merritt. FRE 402 and 403. The Court finds that the relevance of this evidence, if any, is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Also improper disclosure. It is the Court's view that disclosure under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) was required for this witness. Even if not, disclosure was insufficient under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C). Denied as to Dr. McGuigan. I agree that the one paragraph written disclosure is insufficient under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) or (C). However, as counsel is well aware, Dr. McGuigan has been the subject of extensive discovery, both of her file and by deposition (and has been the subject of multiple discovery hearings during which the Court has consistently granted defendant's request for more discovery and disclosure). In the circumstances, the Court finds that her expert opinions and the basis of the opinions has been sufficiently disclosed to meet the achieve the purposes of Rule 26(a)(2). She will, of course, be limited to the opinions disclosed in discovery. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 3/8/17. Text Only Entry (rbjsec. ) (Entered: 03/08/2017)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00581_de145 AdministrativeID "146" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00581_de145 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00581_de145 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-00581_de96 @default.