Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-00671_de245> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00671_de245 RegisterActionDate "2018-07-24" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00671_de245 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' opposed Motion for Leave to File Surreply 245 , arguing that Defendants raised two new arguments in their reply brief to which Plaintiffs seek leave to address in a surreply. The Court has considered the matter and finds that if any new arguments have been raised in the reply, the Court will not rely on them. Pippin v. Burlington Res. Oil And Gas Co., 440 F.3d 1186, 1192 (10th Cir. 2006) ("If the district court does preclude a surreply, then the court can avoid error only by not relying on the new materials and arguments in the movants reply brief."). Accordingly, the Motion 245 is DENIED. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/24/2018. (Text Only Entry ) (rmsec ) (Entered: 07/24/2018)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00671_de245 AdministrativeID "246" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00671_de245 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00671_de245 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-00671_de244 @default.