Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-00761_de58> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00761_de58 RegisterActionDate "2017-05-12" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00761_de58 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER: Before the Court is Defendant Trek's Motion for an Expansion of Page Limits on its Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment 54 . Defendant asks for permission "to respond to the disputed and undisputed facts claimed by Plaintiffs in their Response in a separate Appendices, not to exceed a total of fifteen (15) pages and to submit argument in support of Trek's Motion for Summary Judgment not to exceed fifteen (15) pages." The Court is unclear what Defendant means by "a separate Appendices." Nonetheless, Defendant's motion is GRANTED to the extent that Defendant may have up to 30 pages for its reply brief, calculated according to WJM Revised Practice Standard III.C.1, which Defendant is free to allocate between factual responses and legal arguments as it sees fit. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 05/12/2017. Text Only Entry (wjmlc1) (Entered: 05/12/2017)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00761_de58 AdministrativeID "59" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00761_de58 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-00761_de58 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-00761_de53 @default.