Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-01055_de116> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01055_de116 RegisterActionDate "2019-10-28" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01055_de116 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Notice of Objection to Magistrate Judge Mix's Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Re-Open Deposition of Ocwen F.R.C.P. 30(b)(6) Witness Gina Geezer, Compel Production of Documents, and Request for Sanctions Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 37 116 . This filing displays numerous problems. First, strictly speaking, a notice of objection (as opposed to an actual objection) is no more than a notice and therefore requires no response from any party and no ruling from the Court. Second, even construing the filing as a proper Rule 72(a) objection, it shows no awareness of the standard of review: "clearly erroneous or [] contrary to law." Third, the filing exceeds the applicable page limit, i.e., 15 pages. See WJM Revised Practice Standard III.C.1. Fourth, the filing repeatedly violates D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1(e)'s double-spacing requirement. The undersigned tolerates single-spacing in block quotes, footnotes, and itemized/bulleted lists as long as they are of reasonable length and not overly numerous, but Plaintiff's filing uses single-spaced block quotes to excess, effectively granting himself yet more pages beyond the prescribed limit. For all these reasons, Plaintiff's Notice of Objection is STRICKEN. Plaintiff is, however, GRANTED LEAVE to file a proper Rule 72(a) objection, correcting all of the foregoing, no later than tomorrow, October 29, 2019, by 5:00 PM. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/28/2019. Text Only Entry (wjmlc1) (Entered: 10/28/2019)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01055_de116 AdministrativeID "117" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01055_de116 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01055_de116 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-01055_de115 @default.