Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-01779_de36> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01779_de36 RegisterActionDate "2016-12-21" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01779_de36 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER denying 30 MOTION to Strike 29 Reply to Response to Motion Motion to Strike New Arguments in Reply Brief Or, in the Alternative, for Leave to File Surreply. Having reviewed this motion, response (ECF No. 32) and reply (ECF No. 36), the motion is denied. Note too, defendants' motion to dismiss (consisting of ECF No. 11 and 12) has 24 pages, far exceeding this Court's page limits. The response has 21 pages, again far exceeding my page limits. The reply has 17 pages, once again far exceeding this Court's page limits. Because the excessivly long motion to dismiss was filed before the case was assigned to me, and the response and reply were presumably encumbered by the length of the motion to dismiss, I will not strike them. However, I can tell you that they are unwelcome, and excess motions and briefs will not be accepted in the future. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 12/21/16. Text Only Entry (rbjsec. ) (Entered: 12/21/2016)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01779_de36 AdministrativeID "37" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01779_de36 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01779_de36 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-01779_de28 @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-01779_de36 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-01779_de29 @default.