Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-02080_de47> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02080_de47 RegisterActionDate "2017-09-18" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02080_de47 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE ORDER. On August 11, 2107, defendant filed a supplement 47 to its reply brief noting plaintiffs' statements on August 3, 2017 to Magistrate Judge Shaffer. The statements indicated that one of the two claim files involved in this case involved "a manufacturing defect" that does not exist in "other consolidated actions pending around the country," making that claim file "unique because it's a different failure mode." Id. at 3. In opposition to defendant's Motion to Sever and Dismiss 11 , plaintiffs stated that the "failure mode of each dryer was identical." [15-1] at 1. On or before September 25, 2017, plaintiffs shall file a response to Docket No. 47 addressing why, if the dryer involved in one of its claim files had a unique failure mode, the claims should not be severed. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/18/17. Text Only Entry (pabsec) (Entered: 09/18/2017)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02080_de47 AdministrativeID "48" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02080_de47 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02080_de47 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02080_de10 @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02080_de47 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02080_de46 @default.