Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-02153_de48> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02153_de48 RegisterActionDate "2017-05-24" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02153_de48 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER denying 46 Motion for Protective Order. It does not appear that either party has considered this Court's practice standards in their squabbling about which other judge's protective order should be adopted. Nor has any good reason been provide to this Court as to why public access to the defendant's claims handling or underwriting procedures should be restricted. Court files are open to the public and should remain that way absent compelling reason to preclude the public's access. The parties can agree to whatever confidential treatment of each other's documents they want so long as it pertains to their own handling and use of the documents. However, documents filed with the Court will be publically available absent compelling reason. Examples of compelling reasons are individuals' addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers, and medical records. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 5/24/17. Text Only Entry (rbjsec.) (Entered: 05/24/2017)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02153_de48 AdministrativeID "49" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02153_de48 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02153_de48 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02153_de45 @default.