Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-02275_de23> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02275_de23 RegisterActionDate "2016-10-10" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02275_de23 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER denying 22 Motion for Protective Order without prejudice. The Court believes the parties have made a sufficient showing that a protective order is needed in this case, and appreciates the efforts of the parties to reach an acceptable form of protective order. The Court has concerns, however, that certain provisions of the proposed protective order conflict with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2's method for restricting court filings, exhibits and transcripts. In particular, provisions 1, 3, 15 and 16 appear to contravene Local Rule 7.2. If the parties can reach an agreement on a proposed protective order that complies with Local Rule 7.2, they may submit that revised proposed protective order as an Exhibit to a joint motion for protective order, by Magistrate Judge Scott T Varholak on 10/10/16. Text Only Entry(stv, ) (Entered: 10/10/2016)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02275_de23 AdministrativeID "24" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02275_de23 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02275_de23 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02275_de23 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02275_de21 @default.