Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de394> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 7 of
7
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de394 RegisterActionDate "2018-07-31" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de394 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER: This matter is before the Court on two motions: (1) Non-Party 3D67B0B Partially Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Respond to Show Cause Order ("Motion for Extension") 379 ; and (2) Defendants' Motion to Stay Order to Show Cause Against 3D67B0B ("Motion to Stay") 384 . To the extent Mr. 3D67B0B must disclose information subject to the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine, the Court would employ the same procedures to restrict access to that information regardless of whether it is filed while this case is pending or after its resolution. The Court therefore disagrees that disclosure of privileged information while the merits remain pending would prejudice Defendants, because no such disclosure would necessarily take place. To the extent Defendants believe they will be prejudiced by simultaneously participating in the Order to Show Cause proceedings and the merits of this case, the Court is not convinced on this record that any such prejudice is likely to result. Accordingly, the Motion to Stay is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. As for the Motion for Extension, it is GRANTED to the following extent: Mr. 3D67B0B deadline to respond to the Order to Show Cause is extended to August 17, 2018. However, that response and any other filing Mr. 3D67B0B makes in connection with the Order to Show Cause (other than purely procedural motions such as the Motion for Extension) is subject to the following procedures: (A) No later than two business days before he intends to file a document, Mr. 3D67B0B must serve his final draft and any exhibits (together, "Proposed Filing") on Defendants. Defendants must then inform Mr. 3D67B0B no later than 5:00 PM on the following business day whether they believe the Proposed Filing contains information protected by the attorney-client privilege between Defendants and Mr. 3D67B0B. Defendants shall specifically identify the portion(s) of the Proposed Filing they believe must be redacted to preserve the attorney-client privilege. (B) If (i) Defendants identify portions of the Proposed Filing they believe must be redacted to preserve the attorney-client privilege, or (ii) Mr. 3D67B0B himself believes that portions of the Proposed Filing must be redacted under the work product doctrine, Mr. 3D67B0B shall file the Proposed Filing under Restricted Access, Level 2 (visible to the filing party and the Court). (C) For any filing Mr. 3D67B0B makes under Restricted Access, Level 2, he shall: (i) serve a copy of the as-filed version (displaying the CM/ECF header) on Defendants no later than the business day after the filing, which copy Defendants may not distribute beyond themselves; and (ii) file a redacted version on CM/ECF no later than two business days after the filing. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 07/31/2018. Text Only Entry (wjmlc1) (Entered: 07/31/2018)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de394 AdministrativeID "394" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de394 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de394 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de394 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de379 @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de394 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de384 @default.