Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de467> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de467 RegisterActionDate "2019-03-31" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de467 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER granting in part and taking under advisement in part 465 Motion for Leave to Restrict: Plaintiffs move to restrict certain portions of Plaintiffs motion in limine (ECF #456). To that end, Plaintiffs filed ECF #456 in a redacted fashion and filed an unredacted version (ECF #455) at Level I Restriction. Plaintiffs conferred with Defendants in this matter and Defendants do not object to the proposed restrictions and redactions as filed. However, due to the Courts obligation to insure that the publics right of access to the judicial process is protected, the Court must independently weigh a request for non-disclosure. The Court has carefully reviewed the motions and attachments and finds all redactions appropriate with the exception of those redactions to ECF #455-8 (Barr deposition). Plaintiffs instant motion (ECF #465) gives the Court no further basis for why redaction of ECF #455-8 is appropriate given the balancing test the Court must apply. Therefore, the motion to restrict is GRANTED in substantial part with the exception that the Court takes under advisement the request to restrict ECF #455-8. ECF #455-8 will remain restricted pending further Order of the Court and Plaintiff SHALL file a further supplement as to that portion of the motion to restrict within seven (7) days. No response is needed from the Defense unless the Court specifically states at a later time. So Ordered. by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/31/2019. Text Only Entry (GPG) (Entered: 03/31/2019)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de467 AdministrativeID "467" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de467 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de467 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02304_de465 @default.