Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-02480_de288> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 7 of
7
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02480_de288 RegisterActionDate "2018-03-12" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02480_de288 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER: This matter is before the Court on 286 Plaintiff's Reply in support of his Motion for Court Review 273 of the Order entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak 272 denying Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions and Other Relief 286 . However, Plaintiff's underlying Motion was in substance an objection to Judge Varholak's Order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Reply 286 is STRICKEN pursuant to WJM Practice Standard III.H., which clearly states that "In conformity with Rule 72, no reply in support of an objection made under either Rule 72(a) or Rule 72(b) will be accepted." Moreover, Plaintiff's Reply was e-filed after the Court had already both overruled Plaintiff's Rule 72 Objection and also entered final judgment, terminating this action. There is no basis to accept further briefing on previously-decided issues in this posture. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/12/2018. Text Only Entry (wjmint1, ) (Entered: 03/12/2018)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02480_de288 AdministrativeID "288" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02480_de288 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02480_de288 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02480_de272 @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02480_de288 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02480_de273 @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02480_de288 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02480_de286 @default.