Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-02547_de65> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02547_de65 RegisterActionDate "2018-10-31" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02547_de65 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to file Reply ("Motion") 59 , with proposed Reply [59-1], to support its objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation 49 . Upon consideration of the lengthy record, the Court finds that leave should be granted so it has a full understanding of the parties' positions. In doing so, the Court is mindful of Defendants' argument that Plaintiff is allegedly attempting to raise new objections in the Reply which it did not raise (but should have raised) in its initial objections and will consider this argument as appropriate upon a full review and analysis of the record. Further, the Court finds no undue prejudice and notes that Defendants' opposition to the Motion addresses the substance of the proposed Reply. Accordingly, Defendants' request to file a sur-reply is denied. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion 59 is granted; the Reply [59-1] is accepted and the Clerk is directed to docket the Reply [59-1] as a separate docket entry; and Defendants' request to file a sur-reply is denied. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 10/31/2018. (Text Only Entry ) (rmsec ) (Entered: 10/31/2018)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02547_de65 AdministrativeID "66" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02547_de65 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02547_de65 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02547_de48 @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02547_de65 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02547_de58 @default.