Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-02607_de112> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 8 of
8
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02607_de112 RegisterActionDate "2019-04-17" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02607_de112 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER: The Plaintiff's motions 106 , 107 for leave to file an Amended Complaint are denied as moot insofar as the Court specifically directed such a filing; thus, no leave of the Court to amend was necessary. The Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File a Proposed Pretrial Order 109 is denied. Even assuming a proper appeal may lie as to the claims against EE3 (a matter on which the Court has some doubt), no good cause has been shown for delaying the prosecution of this matter to trial against Defendant FMC. The Plaintiff's 110 Motion for Reconsideration is denied. The arguments raised therein simply repeat arguments that were presented to, considered, and rejected by the Court at summary judgment. Reconsideration is not an appropriate mechanism to re-argue matters that have or could have been brought before the Court earlier. Servants of the Paraclete v. Does, 204 F.3d 1005, 1012 (10th Cir. 2000). By Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/17/19. Text Only Entry (msklc2, ) (Entered: 04/17/2019)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02607_de112 AdministrativeID "113" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02607_de112 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02607_de112 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02607_de105 @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02607_de112 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02607_de106 @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02607_de112 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02607_de108 @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-02607_de112 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-02607_de109 @default.