Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:16-cv-03196_de81> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:16-cv-03196_de81 RegisterActionDate "2018-08-24" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-03196_de81 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER granting 78 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify. Having reviewed the motion, response and reply, the Court finds that plaintiff has represented that counsel has diligently been trying to find and retain an appropriate expert to consider the issues addressed by defendant's expert. I have no reason to doubt the representation. Trial is not imminent, and it does not appear to the Court that the requested extension would cause unfair prejudice or even impose significant additional litigation costs on the defendant. In the absence of unreasonable dilatoriness or misconduct on the part of the plaintiff or unfair prejudice to the defendant, witness preclusion is not preferred. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 8/24/18. Text Only Entry (rbj) (Entered: 08/24/2018)" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-03196_de81 AdministrativeID "82" @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-03196_de81 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:16-cv-03196_de81 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:16-cv-03196_de77 @default.