Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cr-00008_de94> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 8 of
8
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cr-00008_de94 RegisterActionDate "2018-04-23" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cr-00008_de94 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge William J. Martinez: Evidentiary Hearing held on 4/23/2018. ORDERED: Defendant Jean-Pierre's Motion To Revoke Orders of Detention, (ECF Nos. 15 and 77 ) 78 is GRANTED. ORDERED: Magistrate Judge Wang's February 9, 2017 Order of Detention 15 and January 22, 2018 Order 77 denying bond are VACATED and the defendant will be allowed to be released on bond with the revised conditions as set forth on the record and below. ORDERED: The court ADOPTS the conditions recommended in the Pretrial Services Report, ECF No. 20 , subject to the following REVISIONS and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS: 1. The unsecured bond amount is increased to $15,000; 2. The defendant will not be released until both his expired and current United States passports are surrendered; 3. The defendant shall not be released until suitable placement has been obtained in the Independence House halfway house in Denver; 4. The defendant shall be placed on GPS ankle monitoring; 5. The halfway house facility and the U.S. Probation office shall immediately notify Judge William J. Martnez's chambers if there is any tampering with that ankle monitor. ORDERED: The length of the jury trial will be extended for one additional day. The trial will commence, as previously set, on Monday, May 21, 2018.There will be no trial Monday, May 28 nor Friday, May 25. The trial will conclude on Friday, June 8th. ORDERED: The Final Trial Preparation Conference set Friday, May 11, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. is reset to Friday, May 11, 2018 at 3:00 p.m. ORDERED: The defense has until noon, Wednesday, April 25th to file a written reply to the United States' Response to the Motion for James Hearing 89 and To Court's Order 90 specifically responding to the points made in terms of the appropriateness and logic of proceeding under the normal James log procedures that are in the court's Revised Practice Standards and James proffer form, or whether the defense agrees in whole or in part with the Government that the preliminary admissibility issues should be handled in a different way. Court Reporter: Mary George. (dhans, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/24/2018: # 1 Plaintiff's Exhibit List, # 2 Defendant's Exhibit List) (dhans, ). (Entered: 04/24/2018)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cr-00008_de94 AdministrativeID "95" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cr-00008_de94 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- cod;;1:17-cr-00008_de94 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cr-00008_de14 @default.
- cod;;1:17-cr-00008_de94 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cr-00008_de76 @default.
- cod;;1:17-cr-00008_de94 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cr-00008_de77 @default.
- cod;;1:17-cr-00008_de94 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cr-00008_de88 @default.