Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-00977_de35> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-00977_de35 RegisterActionDate "2018-08-13" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-00977_de35 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 35 Motion for Protective Order. Gillard v. Boulder Valley School District, 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000), set out certain requirements for the issuance of a blanket protective order such as the one sought here. Among other things, any information designated by a party as confidential must first be reviewed by a lawyer who will certify that the designation as confidential is "based on a good faith belief that [the information] is confidential or otherwise entitled to protection." Gillard, 196 F.R.D. at 386. Additionally, the protective order must contain a mechanism by which a party may challenge the designation of information as confidential. See id. at 388-89. The proposed Protective Order does not comply with the requirements established in Gillard. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/13/18. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 ) (Entered: 08/13/2018)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-00977_de35 AdministrativeID "36" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-00977_de35 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-00977_de35 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-00977_de35 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-00977_de34 @default.