Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-01341_de189> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01341_de189 RegisterActionDate "2019-01-22" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01341_de189 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER denying 187 Motion for Leave. The document, entitled "Mitigation of Damages" does not appear to seek any relief from the Court. To the extent Plaintiff is seeking to amend his complaint to specify the compensatory damages amount he seeks, Plaintiff must file a motion that "demonstrate[s] (1) good cause for seeking modification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) and (2) satisfaction of the Rule 15(a) standard" for amending pleadings, because the deadline for amendment of pleadings established by the scheduling order has expired. Birch v. Polaris Indus., Inc., 812 F.3d 1238, 1247 (10th Cir. 2015) (quoting Gorsuch, Ltd., B.C. v. Wells Fargo Natl Bank Assn, 771 F.3d 1230, 1240 (10th Cir. 2014)). Plaintiff has failed to do so here. To the extent the "Mitigation of Damages" document was intended to be part of Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 186 , Plaintiff shall file notice with the Court of his intent for the Mitigation of Damages to be considered as part of that response, on or before 2/5/2019. The Clerk of Court is instructed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 1/22/2019. Text Only Entry (stvlc2, ) (Entered: 01/22/2019)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01341_de189 AdministrativeID "190" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01341_de189 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01341_de189 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-01341_de185 @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01341_de189 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-01341_de186 @default.