Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-01472_de100> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01472_de100 RegisterActionDate "2019-03-20" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01472_de100 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER granting in part and denying in part 98 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant Dr. 12D0E1C Motion for Summary Judgment - Partially Unopposed. You need do nothing more than point out the existence of at least one fact that is material to the resolution of your claim against Dr. 12D0E1C, in particular concerning causation, that is genuinely disputed. If you cannot do that, then you deserve to have your claim against him dismissed (and, frankly, you should so stipulate). However, as the Court has warned, see, e.g., ECF No. 81, whether the response if filed today or Friday or next week, it is at best questionable the Court will be able to rule on it, and almost certainly not write a full explanatory order, before the trial on April 15. Yours is the most important case to you, and it is very important to the Court as well, but the Court has many other cases filling up its docket and waiting in line for rulings on motions. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 3/20/19. Text Only Entry (rbjsec. ) (Entered: 03/20/2019)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01472_de100 AdministrativeID "101" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01472_de100 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01472_de100 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-01472_de97 @default.