Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-01602_de61> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01602_de61 RegisterActionDate "2018-07-24" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01602_de61 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' opposed Motion for Leave to File Surreply 61 , arguing that Defendants raised two new arguments in their reply brief to which Plaintiffs seek leave to address in a surreply. The Court has considered the matter and finds that if any new arguments have been raised in the reply, the Court will not rely on them. Pippin v. Burlington Res. Oil And Gas Co., 440 F.3d 1186, 1192 (10th Cir. 2006) ("If the district court does preclude a surreply, then the court can avoid error only by not relying on the new materials and arguments in the movants reply brief."). Accordingly, the Motion 61 is DENIED. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/24/2018. (Text Only Entry ) (rmsec) (Entered: 07/24/2018)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01602_de61 AdministrativeID "62" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01602_de61 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01602_de61 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-01602_de60 @default.