Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-01666_de49> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 7 of
7
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01666_de49 RegisterActionDate "2017-09-09" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01666_de49 RegisterActionDescriptionText "STRICKEN Second MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff FCA320C. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Resolution written by the Plaintiffs with legislative Services declaring all parody forms of marriage secular. This resolution along with two others authored by Plaintiffs are scheduled to be introduced in several states an on the federal level in 2018. Alliance Defending Freedom Opposes this legislative measure because it was not there idea., # 2 Exhibit Motion for Summary Judgment filed in FCA320C v. Bryant in the Northern District of Mississippi., # 3 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom is fighting to promote human trafficking and child exploitation. We continue to ask them to leave our sponsors alone. Plaintiffs are in the District of Columbia working with legislative counsel in drafting the federal version for their sponsors in the House and Senate., # 4 Exhibit Alliance Defending freedom opposes the Human Trafficking Prevention Act for Alabama because it was not their idea and threatens their donors base for flagrant hypocrisy., # 5 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom Opposes HB 337 in Florida birthed out of the 0FD55A8 v. Apple and 0FD55A8 v. Google, # 6 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom Opposes anti-human trafficking measures in Georgia - along with NCOSE because it was not their idea and because their incompetency is causing their donor base to flee., # 7 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom has sided with the human traffickers those seeking to proliferate the exploitation of children because they are only driven by donations., # 8 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom comes out in favor of human trafficking in Louisiana because they fail to understand the law and cannot manage to make competent legal arguments., # 9 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom prayers that minors in Maryland are subjected to pornography consumption due to their incapacity for common sense., # 10 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom is haranguing our legislative sponsors of the resolution that declares that online pornography is a public health crisis., # 11 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom marginalizes our sponsors of the resolution that declares that pornography is a public health crisis in Oklahoma., # 12 Exhibit Simply because the Plaintiffs are working with liberal democrats in New Mexico Alliance Defending freedom opposes the Human Trafficking Prevention Act due to racial animus because they do not want the filter deactivation fee going to Indian reservations, # 13 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom works to undermine Human Trafficking legislation in Texas because it was not there idea., # 14 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom has managed to insult and ostracize Christian Caucuses in West Virginia and in other states due to want amounts to unbridled jealously, # 15 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom has intentionally distorted the truth at all times in order to advance their devotion to legalism despite the Plaintiffs serving them with information that would compel any reasonable person to consider the law., # 16 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom does not understand the holding in Ashcroft and instead works to promote human trafficking, # 17 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom is harassing our Senators in West Virginia who are working to keep children from illegal exposure to unprotected obscene content, # 18 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom is too incompetent to understand that the 6th Circuit abused its discretion but it does not mean that the legislatures are not going around the Courts for cause., # 19 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom fails to understand that although Google is opposed to the section 230 amendment bill by Rep. Wagner that they support the Plaintiffs Human Trafficking legislation that was birthed out of litigation against them., # 20 Exhibit From litigating in 17-cv-1750 the Plaintiffs have authored a resolution that is in drafting with legislative counsel that resolves that man-woman marriage is secular., # 21 Exhibit Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in 0FD55A8 v. Brown in the Northern District of California., # 22 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom fails to understand that in Severe Records v. Rich the Plaintiffs changed the copyright act., # 23 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom fails to understand that the Plaintiffs non-suited their porn filter fee lawsuit after the Senate Majority leader step forward to amend the law after New Jersey passes the bill, the Federal Congress introduces the legislative measure., # 24 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom fails to understand that the Tech Companies settled with the Plaintiffs and that ever single solitary law suit that the Plaintiffs have ever filed have ended in their favor - without exception., # 25 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom comes out in favor of the LGBTQ community indoctrinating children and failures to understand the difference between secular and non-secular in their support of the public display of the LGBTQ flag, # 26 Exhibit Alliance Defending Freedom fails to understand that right after Plaintiff 0FD55A8 sued A&E that he applied pressure on the executives to back down on the removal of Phil Robertson fromthe Duck Dynasty programming. Basically, Alliance Defending Freedom only knows failure.)(FCA320C) Modified on 9/29/2017 pursuant to 80 ORDER (angar, ). (Entered: 09/09/2017)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01666_de49 AdministrativeID "50" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01666_de49 OntologyLabel error @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01666_de49 OntologyLabel motion_for_summary_judgment @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01666_de49 OntologyLabel motion @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01666_de49 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-01666_de79 @default.