Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-01755_de106> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01755_de106 RegisterActionDate "2021-02-25" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01755_de106 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 105 Motion for Protective Order. Gillard v. Boulder Valley School District, 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000), set out certain requirements for the issuance of a blanket protective order such as the one sought here. Among other things, any information designated by a party as confidential must first be reviewed by a lawyer who will certify that the designation as confidential is "based on a good faith belief that [the information] is confidential or otherwise entitled to protection." Id.at 386. Additionally, the protective order must contain a mechanism by which a party may challenge the designation of information as confidential. Id.at 388-89. The proposed protective order does not comply with these requirements. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/25/2021. Text Only Entry(kmtlc1 ) (Entered: 02/25/2021)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01755_de106 AdministrativeID "107" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01755_de106 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01755_de106 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01755_de106 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-01755_de104 @default.