Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-01952_de64> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 8 of
8
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01952_de64 RegisterActionDate "2018-09-05" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01952_de64 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER denying 62 Motion for Extension of Time to File. To the extent Plaintiffs seek an extension of time to file an expert witness list, the Motion is DENIED as moot, as Plaintiffs have already supplied their expert witness list. 63 Insofar as Plaintiffs seek an extension of time to reply to Defendant's responses to Plaintiffs' objections to the Recommendation on the Motion to Dismiss, the Motion is DENIED as moot because the Recommendation on the Motion to Dismiss has already been adopted. 59 Finally, to the extent Plaintiffs seek to extend any other deadlines, the Motion is DENIED without prejudice for failure to confer with opposing counsel, as required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a). If Plaintiffs seek to extend any future deadlines, they must first confer with opposing counsel. If the parties are unable to come to an agreement on resetting discovery deadlines, the parties shall jointly call Chambers at 303.335.2365 to schedule a time for a discovery hearing before the Court, as required by Magistrate Judge Varholak's Civil Practice Standards. The Clerk of Court is instructed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiffs. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 9/5/2018. Text Only Entry (stvlc2, ) (Entered: 09/05/2018)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01952_de64 AdministrativeID "65" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01952_de64 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01952_de64 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01952_de64 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-01952_de58 @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01952_de64 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-01952_de61 @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01952_de64 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-01952_de62 @default.