Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-01962_de47> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01962_de47 RegisterActionDate "2018-04-13" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01962_de47 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 44 Second Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. In his motion, Plaintiff has failed to identify the exact deadlines it wishes to extend. It is not the court's duty to compare the previous scheduling order with the proposed amended scheduling order to make such a determination. Moreover, District Judge Philip A. Brimmer's Civil Practice Standards do not allow extensions pursuant to "inconvenience to counsel or to the parties; the press of business; [or] conflicts in scheduling." See Practice Standards (Civil Cases), Section I.G.1. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/13/18. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 ) (Entered: 04/13/2018)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01962_de47 AdministrativeID "48" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01962_de47 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01962_de47 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-01962_de47 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-01962_de43 @default.