Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-02121_de51> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 7 of
7
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02121_de51 RegisterActionDate "2017-12-15" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02121_de51 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Restrict 46 . Plaintiff seeks to restrict the Motion to Amend Second Amended Complaint, proposed Third Amended Complaint, the exhibits attached thereto, and any proceedings related to these documents 47 . Plaintiff, however, fails to identify with any specificity which documents are confidential or privileged, why the interest in restricting the documents outweighs the presumption of public access, or why there is no practicable alternative, such as redaction, as required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2(c). Moreover, it is unclear how certain documents could be confidential or privileged, such as [47-29]. Accordingly, the Motion 46 is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court, however, is instructed to maintain 47 under Restriction Level 1, pending resolution of this matter and a renewed motion for leave to restrict by Plaintiff. Plaintiff may file a revised Motion for Leave to Restrict that addresses the deficiencies identified by the Court on or before 12/29/2017. If Plaintiff does not file a new motion by 12/29/2017, the Clerk of Court will be instructed to remove the restriction on 47 . SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 12/15/2017. Text Only Entry (stvlc2, ) (Entered: 12/15/2017)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02121_de51 AdministrativeID "52" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02121_de51 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02121_de51 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02121_de51 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-02121_de45 @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02121_de51 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-02121_de46 @default.