Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-02827_de43> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02827_de43 RegisterActionDate "2018-08-02" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02827_de43 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER denying 35 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify without prejudice to refile. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1, a party who files an amended pleading with the consent of the opposing party, or who files a motion for leave to amend, "shall file a separate notice of filing the amended pleading and shall attach as an exhibit a copy of the amended pleading which strikes through... the text to be deleted and underlines... the text to be added." Plaintiff has not filed a redline version, or a clean copy, of his proposed amended complaint. Moreover, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(a), "Before filing a motion,... an unrepresented party shall confer or make reasonable good faith efforts to confer with any opposing counsel... to resolve any disputed matter. The moving party shall describe in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to fulfill this duty." Plaintiff has not included a certificate of conferral in the instant Motion and thus Defendants' position is unclear. For these reasons, the Motion to Amend is DENIED without prejudice. Any future motion to amend must comply with this Court's Local Rules, as discussed above. The Clerk of Court is instructed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 8/2/2018. Text Only Entry (stvlc2, ) (Entered: 08/02/2018)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02827_de43 AdministrativeID "44" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02827_de43 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02827_de43 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02827_de43 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-02827_de34 @default.