Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-02853_de349> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02853_de349 RegisterActionDate "2021-04-06" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02853_de349 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER deferring ruling on 339 MOTION for Reconsideration re 330 Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. No ruling at this time. The parties' positions are disappointing. With respect to Phase I, defendants are requesting numerous additions and modifications. If the Court inadvertently omitted state court findings or conclusions that are relevant to the coming trial, it has no objection to including them. Plaintiffs' counsel has not yet commented on the requested modifications other than to oppose any changes. Regarding Phase II, the Court attempted to fashion a set of findings, conclusions and orders that fairly tracked Judge French's findings to the extent that they appeared to be relevant to the issues in our trial, albeit organizing them somewhat differently. Now, defendants present a wholescale revision of the Court's findings without explaining why the specifics of the Court's version was inaccurate or incomplete. Plaintiffs again oppose the revisions without addressing whether any of them is necessary to make the rendition of Judge French's findings fair and complete. The Court would appreciate counsel's conferring and attempting to reach agreement. Otherwise the Court will either make what it considers to be reasonable modifications to its order or leave its order as is, depending on the time available to the Court before trial. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 4/6/2021. Text Only Entry(rbjsec.) (Entered: 04/06/2021)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02853_de349 AdministrativeID "349" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02853_de349 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02853_de349 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-02853_de329 @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-02853_de349 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-02853_de338 @default.