Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-03002_de40> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-03002_de40 RegisterActionDate "2018-09-18" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-03002_de40 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER striking Defendant's Renewed Motion to Dismiss 40 for failure to comply with WJM Revised Practice Standard III.D.1. This Practice Standard requires counsel to confer prior to filing a motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), in order to discuss whether the alleged deficiency in the operative complaint can be cured by amendment, and to exercise their best efforts to stipulate to such amendment. Here, Defendant states only that Plaintiff opposes the Motion, but does not indicate whether Plaintiff was willing to amend or dismiss the complaint. Furthermore, the Court notes that the Motion exceeds the page limits. This Court's Revised Practice Standard III.C.1 states that the page limits for "ALL OTHER motions... Motion and Response [shall be]: 15 pages; Reply: 10 pages." As a consequence, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is STRICKEN without prejudice to refiling because it contains no statement with respect to whether Plaintiff opposed amending the complaint, and because it exceeds the page limits. Defendant is GRANTED leave to file an Amended Motion to Dismiss which complies in all respects with this Court's Revised Practice Standards on or before September 25, 2018. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/18/2018. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) (Entered: 09/18/2018)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-03002_de40 AdministrativeID "41" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-03002_de40 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-03002_de40 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-03002_de40 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-03002_de39 @default.