Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/cod;;1:17-cv-03111_de100> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 7 of
7
with 100 items per page.
- cod;;1:17-cv-03111_de100 RegisterActionDate "2019-11-19" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-03111_de100 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file any objection to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation 92 , which is conditionally unopposed. In other words, Defendant is unopposed if it is also granted the same extension of time. As the Court will not grant Defendant an extension based on the current record, the Court will treat Plaintiff's motion as opposed. Even if opposed, the Court finds no response is required before ruling. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d) ("Nothing in this rule precludes a judicial officer from ruling on a motion at any time after it is filed."). Upon consideration of the motion, the Court finds Plaintiff has shown good cause for the requested extension. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion 99 is GRANTED and he shall have to and including December 6, 2019 to file any objection. As for Defendant's request, such request is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Defendant also requires an extension of time, it may timely file a motion showing good cause for the requested extension. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/19/2019. (Text Only Entry)(rmsec ) (Entered: 11/19/2019)" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-03111_de100 AdministrativeID "100" @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-03111_de100 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-03111_de100 OntologyLabel order @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-03111_de100 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-03111_de92 @default.
- cod;;1:17-cv-03111_de100 hasReferenceToOtherEntry cod;;1:17-cv-03111_de99 @default.