Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/flsd;;1:16-cv-23901_de252> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- flsd;;1:16-cv-23901_de252 RegisterActionDate "2018-12-08" @default.
- flsd;;1:16-cv-23901_de252 RegisterActionDescriptionText "PAPERLESS ORDER re 223 Plaintiff's SEALED MOTION to Enforce Settlement Agreement filed by 25EC98C, 222 Plaintiff's MOTION To Enforce Settlement Agreement filed by 25EC98C.The Undersigned is scheduling for a hearing on January 3, 2019, at 1:00 p.m. Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement [ECF Nos. 222-223] In connection with the hearing, the parties may by December 28, 2018 file under seal a list of 3 specific questions which they would like the Undersigned to ask opposing counsel at the hearing. The questions may be about the factual record, the law, exhibits, the arguments raised in the briefing or any other issue relevant to the Undersigned's analysis of the motion.To the extent that the questions (which should be precise and pinpoint) concern exhibits, the parties may attach relevant exhibits to the under-seal list of questions. However, the parties should not indiscriminately file massive numbers of exhibits, nor should they file exhibits which run on for dozens of pages. It is highly unlikely that the Undersigned will be inclined to review more than an extremely modest number of pages of exhibits attached to the questions.By providing this alternative, the Undersigned is by no means suggesting that a party should attach exhibits to the questions. In fact, it might be better to simply refer to exhibits already filed (assuming the exhibits are not voluminous but, instead, are manageable and capable of being reviewed in the brief gap between the filing of the questions and the hearing). Although the Undersigned will carefully review all questions submitted, the mere fact that a party submitted a question does not necessarily mean that the Undersigned will in fact ask that specific question (or any of the questions, for that matter). The Undersigned may ask a question, may modify a question, may combine the question with another or may decide to skip the question entirely.To alleviate any conceivable concern that this procedure constitutes some type of ex parte procedure, the Undersigned will read out loud on the record every optional question submitted under seal by the parties, regardless of whether I will actually ask each question.One final point about Allianz. Although Allianz is not a named party in this lawsuit, its counsel attended the mediation and it was expected to fund any settlement. In addition, its counsel attended hearings in this case and also spoke at some of them.The Undersigned will permit Allianz to intervene and fully participate in the January 3, 2019 hearing if it wishes to subject itself to the Court's jurisdiction. If Allianz accepts this opportunity and invitation, then its counsel may argue and also submit under-seal questions. By permitting Allianz to fully participate in the hearing, I am not indicating, either expressly or implicitly, whether Allianz has already subjected itself to the Court's jurisdiction by speaking at other hearings, attending the mediations and engaging in other case-related activity. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 12/10/2018. (JG) (Entered: 12/08/2018)" @default.
- flsd;;1:16-cv-23901_de252 AdministrativeID "248" @default.
- flsd;;1:16-cv-23901_de252 OntologyLabel order @default.
- flsd;;1:16-cv-23901_de252 hasReferenceToOtherEntry flsd;;1:16-cv-23901_de226 @default.