Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de383> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de383 RegisterActionDate "2018-11-14" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de383 RegisterActionDescriptionText "Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Joe Billy McDade: Parties present via phone by Atty T. Pliura with Plf 492726E; Atty B. Colbert on behalf of the Wexford defendants; Atty M. Powell on behalf of the Dfts 989C8EC and 89F6AC9 for Status Conference held on 11/14/2018. Parties reveal that they have each investigated obtaining Plaintiff's surgical records from Charity Hospital in New Orleans. Charity Hospital had merged with the University Medical Center of New Orleans which sustained hurricane damage and loss of records. The parties have been unable to obtain Plaintiff's relevant records though Plaintiff's counsel has contacted several of the companies which manufacture abdominal mesh to determine whether any records can be located through them. The parties agree that if the mesh serial numbers cannot be identified there can be no determination as to whether the mesh implanted in Plaintiff has been the subject of a recall. If that is the case, the parties mutually waive an evidentiary hearing regarding mesh recall. Absent new information on the mesh, the parties agree that the Eighth Amendment issues identified in the complaint will proceed in the normal course with a ruling on the pending motions for summary judgment and, depending on that disposition, trial. Counsel denied any need for additional discovery. Counsel for Defts. 989C8EC and 89F6AC9 is given 21 days, until 12/5/18, in which to file a reply to Plaintiff's response to summary judgment. Plaintiff indicated a willingness to consider settlement. The Court encouraged this and advised that Magistrate Judge Hawley would be available to foster any settlement discussions. Plaintiff had filed 291 , a unilateral Notice of Waiver of Circuit Rule 36 Reassignment, requesting that the case be transferred back to Judge Harold Baker. Defendants asserted in open court that they have no objection to Plaintiff's motion. The Court mistakenly believed that there was a suitable Consent form which could be forwarded to the parties. As this is not the case, the parties may submit a proposed agreed order waiving the Rule 36 Reassignment or, for simplicity's sake, the parties may sign the Notice of Waiver previously filed by Plaintiff's counsel 291 , within 21 days. (Court Reporter JJ.) (RK, ilcd) (Entered: 11/14/2018)" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de383 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de383 OntologyLabel minute_entry @default.
- ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de383 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:16-cv-01024_de377 @default.