Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilcd;;1:17-cv-01312_de46> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01312_de46 RegisterActionDate "2019-04-12" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01312_de46 RegisterActionDescriptionText "TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 4/12/19. This case is nearly two years old. Defense counsel took Plaintiff's deposition on August 8, 2018; discovery closed on October 12, 2018; and Defendant Moats timely filed a motion for summary judgment on November 13, 2018 20 . On January 7, 2019, Plaintiff filed his motion for leave to file an amended complaint 28 . The Court concludes that Moats would suffer undue prejudice if Plaintiff were allowed to amend his complaint well after the close of discovery and while the case is at the summary judgment stage. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion 28 is DENIED. See Johnson v. Cypress Hill, 641 F.3d 867, 873 (7th Cir. 2011) (stating that a plaintiffs "request to change his claims on the eve of summary judgment is exactly the sort of switcheroo [the Seventh Circuit has] counseled against"); Feldman v. Am. Mem'l Life Ins. Co., 196 F.3d 783, 793 (7th Cir. 1999) (finding that the prejudice that would result from amendment that would have added a new claim "well after the close of discovery and on the eve of summary judgment proceedings" was so apparent that the district court was not required to articulate the basis for its decision). (TC, ilcd) (Entered: 04/12/2019)" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01312_de46 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01312_de46 OntologyLabel order @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01312_de46 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01312_de29 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01312_de46 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01312_de38 @default.