Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 13 of
13
with 100 items per page.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98 RegisterActionDate "2019-04-08" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98 RegisterActionDescriptionText "TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins on 4/8/2019. On September 18, 2018, the Court denied Plaintiff's three motions to compel because Plaintiff's filings were unclear as to which discovery requests were at issue. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to renew, instructing Plaintiff that any motion to compel must include Defendants' discovery responses and identify the responses Plaintiff alleged were inadequate. Plaintiff filed two motions to compel 52 , 54 before the Court's October 22, 2018, deadline, but Plaintiff did not attach Defendants' discovery responses to those filings. On November 5, 2018, Plaintiff filed two additional motions to compel 57 , 58 and attached Defendants' discovery responses to one of his filings 57 , but Plaintiff did not identify the discovery requests at issue as the Court instructed. Therefore, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motions to compel 52 , 54 , 57 , 58 . Plaintiff has also filed two motions for subpoenas, requesting copies of the log-in sheets for medications delivered to him 55 and photographs that were allegedly taken of his hands 56 . Defendants respond that Plaintiff has previously requested these documents from Defendants and that Plaintiff is attempting to circumvent the discovery procedure by utilizing a subpoena. Defendants attach their responses to Plaintiff's requests for these documents, wherein Defendants state they do not currently possess these documents but that they have requested the documents and will supplement their discovery responses once the documents are received, if they exist. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's motions for subpoenas 55 , 56 but orders Defendants to confirm, within fourteen days of the entry of this order, whether Plaintiff's requested discovery exists and if so, whether Defendants have complied with their duty to supplement their discovery responses. On another matter, the Court GRANTS Defendant 0A835F7 motion 84 to stay the deadline to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 81 , pending a ruling on Defendant's motion to strike Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 82 . (Miscellaneous Deadline 4/22/2019) (KE, ilcd) (Entered: 04/08/2019)" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98 OntologyLabel order @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de61 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de63 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de64 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de65 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de66 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de67 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de94 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de95 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de98 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01364_de97 @default.