Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de49> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 9 of
9
with 100 items per page.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de49 RegisterActionDate "2019-01-07" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de49 RegisterActionDescriptionText "TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on 1/7/2019. Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order 31 is GRANTED as to the request for a protective order, and denied as to any other relief requested. The Court declines to enter the Defendants' proposed order as Section I(B) contains contradictory statements regarding disclosure of confidential information to a pro se litigant. Compare Section I(B)(i), with Section I(B)(vi). Defendants are directed to resubmit a revised proposed order within 14 days of this Order that deletes the following language in Section I(B)(vi): "so long as such disclosure takes place only in the presence of the parties legal counsel of record." Once resubmitted, the Court will enter the revised protective order. Plaintiff's Motion for Subpoenas 37 is GRANTED. Clerk is directed to issue, and send to Plaintiff for service, two subpoenas to: Galesburg Cottage Hospital, 695 North Kellogg Street, Galesburg, IL 61401; and, Hill Correctional Center, Attn: Custodian of Records, 600 South Linwood Road, Galesburg, IL 61401. Plaintiff's Motion for Recruitment of Counsel 33 is DENIED with leave to renew. Plaintiff has no constitutional or statutory right to counsel in this case. In considering the Plaintiffs motion, the court asks: (1) has the indigent Plaintiff made a reasonable attempt to obtain counsel or been effectively precluded from doing so; and if so, (2) given the difficulty of the case, does the plaintiff appear competent to litigate it himself? Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). Plaintiff previously made a showing that he made a reasonable attempt to obtain counsel on his own. Plaintiff states that prison officials have taken medical records from an outside hospital from his file, that he has since had reconstructive shoulder surgery, and that he has witnesses with whom he cannot correspond. Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that he suffered a shoulder injury and that Defendants did little to alleviate his pain, and failed to order diagnostic testing. Plaintiff has personal knowledge of the pain he experienced and the medical treatment he did or did not receive. Plaintiff can testify to those facts, he should be able to obtain records from the outside hospital via the subpoenas discussed above, and, should this case require a trial, Plaintiff will have an opportunity to identify the witnesses he wishes to testify. This case is still in the discovery stage, and, at this point, Plaintiff appears capable of representing himself. The parties' respective motions seeking an extension of time 35 36 are GRANTED. Discovery shall be completed by February 1, 2019. Dispositive motions shall be filed by March 1, 2019.(KB, ilcd) (Entered: 01/07/2019)" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de49 AdministrativeID "None" @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de49 OntologyLabel order @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de49 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de37 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de49 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de39 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de49 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de41 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de49 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de42 @default.
- ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de49 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilcd;;1:17-cv-01505_de43 @default.