Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:01-cr-01093_de127> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:01-cr-01093_de127 RegisterActionDate "2004-09-08" @default.
- ilnd;;1:01-cr-01093_de127 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE ORDER of 9/8/04 by Hon. Harry D. Leinenweber as to 136BDFA : 136BDFA request to withdraw the Section 2255 petition and file a pro se petition, as well as allow a thirty day extension from date received is is denied [117-1] without prejudice nunc pro tunc. Mr. 136BDFA request was received via a letter to chambers and not through any motion noticed by his attorney. Mr. Lopez, who remains active counsel of counsel of record. The proper course here is for Mr. 136BDFA to have his attorney request of modification or amendment (or withdrawal) of Section 2255 petition. If Mr. 136BDFA cannot reach agreement with his attorney and persists in acting pro se, the correct couse is for Mr. Lopez to withdraw representation. Assuming that the inital petition was filed in a timely basis, the court may construe any future amendments to the petition liberally. Mailed notice (pmp) (Entered: 09/09/2004)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:01-cr-01093_de127 AdministrativeID "119" @default.
- ilnd;;1:01-cr-01093_de127 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- ilnd;;1:01-cr-01093_de127 OntologyLabel order @default.