Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:01-cv-03203_de13> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 8 of
8
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:01-cv-03203_de13 RegisterActionDate "2001-11-08" @default.
- ilnd;;1:01-cv-03203_de13 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE ORDER of 11/8/01 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall: In minute order dated 05/15/01, the court dismissed this case without prejudice because "the case was filed with no apparent complaint, appearance form or filing fee." Minute Order, 05/15/01. On 05/29/01, the plainitff filed an "Amended Complaint" along with a motion to proceed informa pauperis [5-1], a motion for appointment of counsel [6-1], and a motion to reopen the case [8-1]. On 06/14/01, the court denied plaintiff's motion to proceed informa pauperis [5-1] because " the sloppy, slapdash complaint plaintiff had filed failed utterly to inform the court of whether plaintff had a claim or not." Minute Order, 06/14/01. Now the court denies denies plaintiff's motions to reopen the case [8-1] and for appointment of counsel [6-1], both of which are predicated on the same complaint underlying the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. As the court stated previously, until plaintiff can "explain her claim so that the court can understand it," plaintiff cannot proceed with this litigation. Id. Plaintiff asserts that her handwriting is poor due to arthritis, The problem is not plaintiff's handwriting. It is that the complaint fails to set forth a comprehensible statement of plaintiff's claim. Mailed notice. (fce) (Entered: 11/14/2001)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:01-cv-03203_de13 AdministrativeID "11" @default.
- ilnd;;1:01-cv-03203_de13 OntologyLabel dismiss_without_prejudice @default.
- ilnd;;1:01-cv-03203_de13 OntologyLabel order @default.
- ilnd;;1:01-cv-03203_de13 hasIfpJudgeAttribution SJ000700 @default.
- ilnd;;1:01-cv-03203_de13 hasIfpLabel IFP_DENY @default.
- ilnd;;1:01-cv-03203_de13 hasIfpLabel IFP_OTHER @default.