Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:02-cv-04044_de9> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-04044_de9 RegisterActionDate "2002-06-21" @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-04044_de9 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE ORDER of 6/21/02 by Hon. George M. Marovich : Reference is made to the plaintiff's letter # 6 seeking habeas relief. The plaintiff is advised that letters to the judge are not permitted. If the plaintiff seeks court action, he must file a motion for the relief sought with the Clerk of the Court. The plaintiff is further reminded that he must provide the court with the original plus a judge's copy of every document filed; furthermore, he should draft pleadings and motions only on the front side of paper, as the court's filing system does not easily accommodate two-sided documents. The plaintiff is also encouraged to write in plain English. The court does not expect the plaintiff to write like a lawyer; "legalese" will only muddy what the plaintiff is trying to say and confuse the court. Turning to the substance of the motion, the court cannot grant habeas relief or even consider the plaintiff's entitlement to an immediate or more speedy release from prison in the context of a civil rights action. The only possible remaining claim in this case, regarding which the court is awaiting an amended complaint, see Minute Order of 6/14/02, is that prison officials acted with deliberate indifference to the plaintiff's safety. The plaintiff's separate habeas case, 55A981D v. State of Illinois, Case No. 00 C 3054, has been dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. See Minute Order of August 9, 2000 (Aspen, J.) As discussed in the court's prior order, renewed claims for habeas relief are not appropriate in this case. Mailed notice (eav) (Entered: 06/24/2002)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-04044_de9 AdministrativeID "7" @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-04044_de9 OntologyLabel order @default.