Matches in SCALES for { <http://schemas.scales-okn.org/rdf/scales#/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:02-cv-05874_de34> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-05874_de34 RegisterActionDate "2004-01-27" @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-05874_de34 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE ORDER of 1/27/04 by Honorable Michael T. Mason : Plaintiff's motion to reconsider and for an order pursuant to Rule 56(d) is denied. [26-1] It is within the Court's discretion to decide whether a Rule 56(d) order would be helpful to the progress of the litigation. Kinesoft Development Corp. v. Softbank Holdings, Inc., 2000 WL 1898577 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 20, 2000.) We find that such an order would not be helpful in this case and therefore plaintiff's motion is denied. This case consists of a single nine paragraph complaint in which the plaintiff seeks an award of delinquent contributions for a specified dollar amount. There are genuine issues of material fact and therefore summary judgment is not appropriate. We will not waste judicial resoures and decide a single count complaint piecemeal. The next status is set for 2/19/04 at 9:00 a.m. At that time we will either set a date for a settlement conference or set this case for trial. No appearance is required on the noticed motion date of 1/29/04. Mailed notice by judge's staff (eav) (Entered: 01/28/2004)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-05874_de34 AdministrativeID "27" @default.
- ilnd;;1:02-cv-05874_de34 OntologyLabel order @default.